MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412100549 · doi:10.2298/saj2510013s

Study of a giant large Magellanic Cloud Supernova Remnant, Veliki (J0450.4-7050)

2025· article· en· W4412100549 on OpenAlexaff
Zachary J. Smeaton, M. D. Filipović, R. Z. E. Alsaberi, Б. Арбутина, W. D. Cotton, E. J. Crawford, Andrew Hopkins, R. Kothes, D. A. Leahy, J. L. Payne, N. Rajabpour, Hidetoshi Sano, M. Sasaki, D. Urošević, Jacco Th. van Loon

Bibliographic record

VenueSerbian Astronomical Journal · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstrophysics and Cosmic Phenomena
Canadian institutionsUniversity of CalgaryHerzberg Institute of Astrophysics
FundersSerbian Academy of Sciences and ArtsNational Research FoundationBulgarian Academy of SciencesGovernment of Western AustraliaMinistarstvo Prosvete, Nauke i Tehnološkog RazvojaScience Fund of the Republic of SerbiaAustralian GovernmentJapan Society for the Promotion of ScienceCommonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research OrganisationCurtin University of TechnologyAstronomy Australia LimitedScience and Industry Endowment FundNational Science Foundation
KeywordsPhysicsLarge Magellanic CloudAstrophysicsSupernovaAstronomyGalaxy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present a high-resolution radio-continuum view and multi-frequency analysis of the Large Magellanic Cloud (LMC) Supernova Remnant (SNR) J0450.4-7050, which we nicknamed Veliki. These high-resolution observations reveal a larger extent than previously measured, making J0450.4-7050 one of the largest SNRs that we know of. Additionally, we observe a higher than expected radio surface brightness and an unusually at spectral index (? = -0:26 ? 0:02), with little spectral variation over the remnant. We observe a bright H? shell indicating significant cooling over the remnant, but also an excess of [OIII] on the eastern shock front. We investigate several theoretical scenarios to explain the emission and radio evolution of J0450.4-7050 in the context of the LMC environment, and determine that this is most likely an older, predominantly radiative, SNR with a higher shock compression ratio, which gives a flatter non-thermal spectrum in combination with thermal (bremsstrahlung) emission contribution.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSerbian Astronomical JournalSame topicAstrophysics and Cosmic PhenomenaFrench-language works237,207