Protection Against Persistent HPV-16/18 Infection After Different Number of Doses of Quadrivalent Vaccine in Girls and Young Women
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Importance: There are no randomized studies comparing the long-term effectiveness of a 2-dose schedule (administered at 0 and 6 months) of quadrivalent human papillomavirus vaccine (4vHPV) with a 2 + 1-dose schedule (administered at 0, 6, and 60 months) given to preadolescents for the prevention of persistent HPV-16 and HPV-18 infection. Objective: To evaluate whether a 2-dose 4vHPV schedule is noninferior to a 2 + 1-dose schedule for preventing persistent HPV-16 and HPV-18 infection up to 13 years after the first dose. Design, Setting, and Participants: This 2-arm, parallel, noninferiority, randomized clinical trial (RCT), called ICI-VPH (Impact of HPV Immunization Schedules Against HPV), was conducted in Québec, Canada, from 2013 to 2021. Eligible participants were girls who had received 2 doses of 4vHPV, 6 months apart when they were aged 9 to 11 years, 5 years prior to trial recruitment. Efficacy-evaluable population analysis was conducted between April 2023 and June 2024. Interventions: Participants were randomized 1:1 to the 2-dose or 2 + 1-dose groups. The 2 + 1-dose group received a booster dose of 4vHPV at the recruitment visit. Both groups were instructed on how to self-collect a vaginal sample, provided an initial vaginal swab, and completed an online questionnaire. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was persistent HPV-16 and HPV-18 infection, defined as the presence of HPV-16 or HPV-18 DNA in 2 consecutive vaginal samples self-collected 5 to 15 months apart. Results: Among the 3356 participants, the mean (SD) age at enrollment was 14.8 (0.4) years, and 2867 (85.4%) were French Canadian individuals. Of the 3364 participants initially randomized, 8 (0.2%) withdrew immediately after randomization, 1675 (49.8%) were assigned to the 2-dose group, and 1681 (50.0%) were assigned to the 2 + 1-dose group. Of the 16 989 genotyping tests analyzed, 31 (0.2%) detected vaccine-type HPV-6, -11, -16, and -18. Only 1 participant in the 2 + 1-dose group (0.1%) had a time-limited persistent HPV-16 infection. Conclusions and Relevance: This clinical trial found that the incidence of HPV-16 and HPV-18 infection was low with both the 2-dose and 2 + 1-dose 4vHPV schedules. A 2-dose schedule provided robust protection against persistent HPV-16 and HPV-18 infection for up to 13 years, suggesting that a booster dose administered at 60 months would not provide additional benefit. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02009800.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Direct model labels (unvalidated)
Per-model category and study-design labels from the labeling rounds. They are machine output, unvalidated, and the disagreement between models ships as data. No study design here is MEDLINE-validated yet.
| Model arm | Categories | Study design | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| gemma | no category Domain: not available · Genre: Empirical About the Canadian research system: no · About a Canadian topic: no | Observational | low |
| gpt | no category Domain: not available · Genre: Empirical About the Canadian research system: no · About a Canadian topic: no | Observational | low |
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedLabeled directly by 2 models reading the full record.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".