MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4412122456 · doi:10.5194/epsc-dps2025-1149

On the Transport of Material Interior to the Orbit of Io During the Formation of the Galilean Satellites 

2025· preprint· en· W4412122456 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
S. M. Giuliatti Winter, Rafael Ribeiro, Gustavo Madeira, André Izidoro

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstro and Planetary Science
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGalilean moonsGalileanAstrobiologyOrbit (dynamics)AstronomyPhysicsAerospace engineeringNatural satelliteClassical mechanicsSolar SystemEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

On the Transport of Material Interior to the Orbit of Io During the Formation of the Galilean Satellites Silvia Giuliatti Winter1, Rafael Ribeiro1, Gustavo Madeira 2, and André Izidoro3 Silvia Giuliatti Winter et al. Silvia Giuliatti Winter1, Rafael Ribeiro1, Gustavo Madeira 2, and André Izidoro3 1São Paulo State University, Faculdade de Engenharia e Ciências, Guaratinguetá, 12516-410, Brazil (giuliatti.winter@unesp.br) 2Observatório Nacional/MCTI, Rio de Janeiro, 20921-400, Brazil 3Department of Earth, Environmental and Planetary Sciences, 6100 Main MS 126, Rice University, Houston, TX 77005, USA 1São Paulo State University, Faculdade de Engenharia e Ciências, Guaratinguetá, 12516-410, Brazil (giuliatti.winter@unesp.br) 2Observatório Nacional/MCTI, Rio de Janeiro, 20921-400, Brazil 3Department of Earth, Environmental and Planetary Sciences, 6100 Main MS 126, Rice University, Houston, TX 77005, USA The so-called Galilean satellites -- Io, Europa, Ganymede, and Callisto -- correspond to a dynamically compact system, with the satellites orbiting in nearly circular and coplanar orbits. The three inner satellites (Io, Europa, Ganymede) are involved in a 4:2:1 mean motion resonance (MMR) chain, while Callisto is situated beyond the 2:1 MMR with Ganymede (Peale, 1999). The current distances of Io, Europa, Ganymede, and Callisto from Jupiter are 5.9RJ, 9.4RJ, 15RJ, and 26.4RJ, respectively (Schubert et al., 2004), where RJ is the radius of Jupiter. All of these satellites have masses on the order of 10-5 masses of Jupiter (MJ). Within the orbit of Io, there is a population of small moons around Jupiter, namely Metis, Adrastea, Amalthea, and Thebe. Metis and Adrastea have sizes approximately around 21.7km and 8.2km, in nearly circular and coplanar orbits. In contrast, Thebe and Amalthea are considerably larger, with diameters of about 49.2km and 83.6km, respectively. These small moons are nearby or embedded in the ring system of Jupiter. The formation and evolution of small satellites remain inconclusive. The goal of this work is to evaluate the efficiency of satellite implantation, during the formation of Galilean satellites, interior to the orbit of Io, focusing on their potential to evolve into orbits similar to those of Jupiter's small inner moons. To achieve this, we performed N-body numerical simulations to model the implantation of satellitesimals, initially distributed between 5RJ and 100RJ, in the region of the small moons (

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.029
Threshold uncertainty score0.057

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.201
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAstro and Planetary Science→French-language works237,207→