MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412124358 · doi:10.1126/sciadv.adv6734

Confinement-induced chirality in phase-separated achiral polymer solutions

2025· article· en· W4412124358 on OpenAlexaff
Baichuan Kou, Jin-Sheng Wu, Yingshan Ma, Yuhang Huang, Xiao He, Tianyi Wu, Zhibo Yang, Paul van der Schoot, Ivan I. Smalyukh, Eugenia Kumacheva

Bibliographic record

VenueScience Advances · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicLiquid Crystal Research Advancements
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChirality (physics)Liquid crystalPolymerChemical physicsMaterials scienceSoft matterPhase (matter)WettingIsotropyAnisotropyNanotechnologyOpticsChemistryComposite materialChiral symmetry breakingOrganic chemistryPhysicsOptoelectronicsSymmetry breaking

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Self-organization of polymers in constrained geometries largely determines their applications in high-strength materials, photonics, and electronics. Chiral organization under confinement is well established for polymers with intrinsic molecular chirality; however, it has not been observed for achiral polymers. Here, we report the emergence of chirality in spatially confined solutions of achiral rigid-rod polymers. We show that kinetically arrested phase separation of polymer solutions confined to narrow capillaries resulted in alternating segments of isotropic and chiral nematic phases. The chiral structure of the nematic segments originated from the interplay between the constrained geometry, surface anchoring, orientational wetting, and elastic anisotropy of rigid-rod polymers. The catenoidal shape of the chiral structure recapitulated the morphology of biological chiral structures. These findings provide insight into the organization of soft matter under spatial confinement and offer a straightforward way to form chiral structures from achiral synthetic polymers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.623

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.403
Teacher spread0.358 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueScience AdvancesSame topicLiquid Crystal Research AdvancementsFrench-language works237,207