MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412124535 · doi:10.2139/ssrn.5345672

Stochastic Stability of Gyroscopic Viscoelastic Systems and Applications in Axially Moving Bands

2025· preprint· en· W4412124535 on OpenAlexafffund
Prof. dr. Jian Deng, Wei‐Chau Xie

Bibliographic record

VenueSSRN Electronic Journal · 2025
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicVibration and Dynamic Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of WaterlooLakehead University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsViscoelasticityAxial symmetryGyroscopeStability (learning theory)PhysicsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper investigates the stochastic stability of gyroscopic viscoelastic systems subjected to parametric wide-band noise excitation. The analysis focuses on both moment stability, using moment Lyapunov exponents, and almost-sure stability, via the largest Lyapunov exponent. The wide-band noises considered include Gaussian white noise and Ornstein–Uhlenbeck noise. The Stratonovich stochastic differential equations governing the system with small damping and weak excitation are first converted to Itô stochastic differential equations through stochastic averaging techniques. An elegant mathematical framework is then introduced to approximate the moment Lyapunov exponents through stochastic transformations and an eigenvalue problem. The largest Lyapunov exponent is subsequently derived based on its relationship with the moment Lyapunov exponents. An application example involves deriving the stochastic equations of motion for an axially moving band system with fluctuating tension, analyzing its stochastic stability. The analytical approximations are validated via Monte Carlo simulations and compared with results from the literature. The study also discusses the influence of various parameters on the system’s stability, with potential applications in engineering fields.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSSRN Electronic JournalSame topicVibration and Dynamic AnalysisFrench-language works237,207