MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A Novel Protection Scheme Using Voltage for Inverter-Based Isolated Microgrids

2025· article· en· W4412129271 on OpenAlexaff
Abbas Hasani, Xiaodong Liang

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicIslanding Detection in Power Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsScheme (mathematics)Computer scienceVoltageInverterElectronic engineeringReliability engineeringElectrical engineeringEngineeringMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Due to increasing deployment of renewable energy sources, inverter-based isolated microgrids (IBIMGs) can be used to supply power in remote areas. However, due to lower fault currents in IBIMGs regulated by control systems of inverter-based resources, conventional overcurrent protection methods are no longer effective, and innovative protection schemes need to be developed to ensure reliable system operations. Due to the small scale of IBIMGs, any short-circuit fault (SCF) results in a widespread voltage drop, making selective protection through local voltage measurement impractical. This paper proposes a voltage-based, communication-assisted protection scheme. SCFs are initially detected by a master relay located upstream, which sends trip commands to downstream relays. An automatic reclosing procedure is then initiated, where individual smart relays reclose the respective lines based on the healthy voltage they sense, allowing for effective fault localization and isolation to ensure the system reliability. A line is identified as faulty if its re-energization fails to restore a healthy voltage. Simulation case studies on a sample radial IBIMG validate the effectiveness of the proposed scheme.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicIslanding Detection in Power SystemsFrench-language works237,207