Perceived quality of life using IMPACT-III in a sample of Colombian children with IBD in remission: a cross-sectional study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction: No data on quality of life (QoL) in paediatric IBD in Colombia. The aim of this study was to determine QoL using the IMPACT-III questionnaire in a sample of patients from different centres. Materials and methods: Cross-sectional study of paediatric IBD patients followed in 3 centres in different cities, between June and November 2022. Eligible subjects were identified, information was collected on different dates, and the IMPACT-III questionnaire (score ranges from 35 to 175, with higher scores indicating better QoL) was administered once. Results: 33 patients were included. 23/33 (69.7%) female, mean age 14.9 (range 6-17.9) years. 94% with inactive or mild disease. 20 patients with ulcerative colitis (UC), 13 with Crohn's disease (CD). The median score in UC was 147 (122-152), while in CD it was 126 (105-135). Systemic symptoms and emotional functioning were most affected, with median scores of 13 (12-14) and 27 (20-31) in UC and 11 (9-11) and 23 (20-26) in CD. No statistically significant differences were observed. Conclusions: The quality of life of children with IBD is challenging due to several factors. More support and education is needed for these patients.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".