MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412156216 · doi:10.1177/26350254241301444

Physeal-Sparing MPFL Reconstruction Technique With Lateral Retinaculum Lengthening

2025· article· en· W4412156216 on OpenAlexaff
Lily J. Qian, Amanda J. Schroeder, Kevin G. Shea, Trenton Cooper, Marc Tompkins

Bibliographic record

VenueVideo Journal of Sports Medicine · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicLower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies
Canadian institutionsGlencore (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRetinaculumMedicineOrthodonticsComputer scienceAnatomyGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: In skeletally immature patients, medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction must consider the femoral physis while also trying to reproduce the ligament as anatomically as possible. There is currently no gold-standard surgical approach. Indications: Previous surgical techniques for MPFL reconstruction in skeletally immature patients have described methods to avoid the physis, but it is difficult to accomplish this and still place the tunnel at Shottle's point. The technique described in this video allows the surgeon to find Shottle's point while still placing a tunnel that is all-epiphyseal. Technique Description: Following MPFL attachment to the patella, the guide pin is placed at Schottle's point under fluoroscopic guidance, and the scope is placed facing the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) footprint. With the knee at 90° of flexion or greater, the guide pin is passed through the femoral condyle, aiming directly at the scope such that the pin enters the notch through the PCL footprint. The pin can then be passed anteriorly through the knee and the anterolateral soft tissues without endangering the lateral femoral condyle or the patellar tendon. A blind-ended tunnel is then drilled through the epiphysis to the level of the cortex making up the PCL footprint. Care is taken to ensure appropriate graft length such that the graft does not "bottom out" in the tunnel. The graft is passed into the tunnel and secured with an interference screw while the knee is in 45° to 60° of flexion. Results: Expected outcomes for this all-epiphyseal MPFL reconstruction are very good. Patients begin physical therapy immediately after surgery and are allowed full weightbearing and full range of motion without a brace. Discussion/Conclusion: The MPFL attachment is very near the medial femoral physis. Due to the undulating physis, placing the start of the femoral tunnel at the femoral MPFL attachment point requires that the tunnel trajectory be directed toward the center of the knee. The technique described in this video allows for all-epiphyseal femoral tunnel drilling with a starting point at the MPFL femoral attachment, allowing the graft to be placed as anatomically as possible. Patient Consent Disclosure Statement: The author(s) attests that consent has been obtained from any patient(s) appearing in this publication. If the individual may be identifiable, the author(s) has included a statement of release or other written form of approval from the patient(s) with this submission for publication.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueVideo Journal of Sports MedicineSame topicLower Extremity Biomechanics and PathologiesFrench-language works237,207