MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412157107 · doi:10.1530/rep-24-0464

Impacts of maternal excess adiposity on the uterine immune environment: contributions to placental dysfunction and adverse pregnancy outcomes

2025· review· en· W4412157107 on OpenAlexaff
Christian J. Bellissimo, Alexander G. Beristain, Deborah M. Sloboda

Bibliographic record

VenueReproduction · 2025
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGestational Diabetes Research and Management
Canadian institutionsBC Children's HospitalMcMaster UniversityUniversity of British ColumbiaMcMaster University Medical Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPregnancyImmune systemOffspringMedicineOverweightPlacentaObesityFetusObstetricsPhysiologyImmunologyEndocrinologyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In brief: Maternal excess adiposity (i.e. overweight and obesity) increases the risk of obstetrical complications, adverse pregnancy outcomes, and chronic health conditions postnatally. These risks are partly rooted in poor placental development and function. Compositional and functional disturbances to uterine-resident immune cells are likely to contribute to the increased burden of placental malperfusion and inflammatory injury seen in pregnancies complicated by overweight and obesity. Here, we summarize the current knowledge surrounding how excess adiposity influences the tissue-resident immune milieu of the uterus during the periconceptional period and across gestation. Abstract: Dynamic compositional and functional changes in the uterine immune environment occur across pregnancy to support placental development and fetal growth. Parental exposures that modify the differentiation, trafficking, or effector functions of uterine-resident immune cells, including chronic health conditions, have been linked to placental dysfunction and the development of obstetrical complications. Overweight and obesity (i.e. excess adiposity) is the most common chronic condition affecting pregnant people in most Westernized countries and is associated with an increased risk of multiple obstetrical complications underpinned by poor placental development and function. Emerging evidence supports the notion that maternal excess adiposity is linked to an altered immune landscape at the uteroplacental interface beginning early in pregnancy. This likely contributes to the development of malperfusion and inflammatory injury that fuels placental dysfunction and primes for adverse pre- and postnatal outcomes. However, a comprehensive understanding of how maternal excess adiposity affects the uterine immune milieu is currently lacking, particularly during the critical stages of placental development. In this review, we provide a summary of current knowledge regarding the ontogeny and function of tissue-resident leukocytes at the uteroplacental interface, focusing on the major populations of innate immune cells that contribute to placental development in humans. We also discuss the impacts of maternal obesity on placental development and function, how these outcomes may be related to the findings from recent periconceptional immunophenotyping studies and outline important areas for future investigation in this field.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.340
Teacher spread0.319 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueReproductionSame topicGestational Diabetes Research and ManagementFrench-language works237,207