MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Abstract B056: Deep Antigen Sets, a new deep-learning framework, enables in vivo modeling of patient neoantigens for effective targeted immunotherapy design

2025· article· en· W4412163755 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Michail Chatzianastasis, Robert Burns, Helio A. Costa, Matthew Rabinowitz, Feida Zhang

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical Cancer Research · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicImmunotherapy and Immune Responses
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsImmunotherapyMedicineAntigenIn vivoCancerCancer immunotherapyImmunologyImmune systemBiologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background: Personalized cancer vaccines hold immense promise, yet their efficacy hinges on accurately predicting immunogenic neoantigens—tumor-specific peptides that elicit robust immune responses. Current machine learning algorithms, trained using in vitro epitope-level immunogenicity data, are limited by the scarcity of experimentally validated immunogenic epitopes and often fail to generalize to immune responses observed in vivo. Methods: We introduce Deep Antigen Sets (DAS), a novel deep-learning framework that enhances neoantigen prediction by directly modeling patient-level immune responses while making precise predictions at the individual neoantigen level. Using DeepSets, a permutation-invariant architecture, DAS models the set of potential neoantigens, which will vary in size, as a holistic input. This allows us to uniquely leverage patient-level clinical outcomes, bridging the gap between in vitro and in vivo predictions. Furthermore, we implemented a targeted sampling strategy to filter out likely non-immunogenic epitopes, refining the training set with the most informative neoantigen candidates to enhance robustness and generalization. DAS is evaluated on two fronts: first, by assessing its ability to prioritize experimentally validated immunogenic neoantigens among the top-ranked predictions for each patient, and second, by predicting whether a patient is likely to respond to immunotherapy based solely on their neoantigen profile. Results: The performance of DAS was benchmarked on three external clinical datasets—NCI, TESLA, and HiTIDE—each containing experimentally validated immunogenic neoantigens, as well as on an internal test cohort annotated with patient responses to immunotherapy. After training on neoantigen sets from 543 in-house patients, DAS achieved 69% AUC in predicting clinical response on the internal hold-out cohort. Furthermore, DAS consistently outperformed existing neoantigen prediction models across all three external clinical datasets. Specifically, it recovered over 60%, 80%, and 90% of validated immunogenic neoantigens within the top 20, 50, and 100 ranked predictions per patient, respectively. Conclusions: DAS constitutes a paradigm shift by directly modeling in vivo neoantigen sets and patient responses to enhance the potential of personalized cancer vaccines. Its computational efficiency facilitates the rapid analysis of large patient cohorts, seamlessly integrating into clinical workflows. This powerful tool empowers oncologists and immunologists to design more effective targeted immunotherapies, ultimately improving patient outcomes. Citation Format: Michail Chatzianastasis, Robert Burns, Helio Costa, Matthew Rabinowitz, Frank Zhang. Deep Antigen Sets, a new deep-learning framework, enables in vivo modeling of patient neoantigens for effective targeted immunotherapy design [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference in Cancer Research: Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning; 2025 Jul 10-12; Montreal, QC, Canada. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2025;31(13_Suppl):Abstract nr B056.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.081
GPT teacher head0.437
Teacher spread0.357 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClinical Cancer Research→Same topicImmunotherapy and Immune Responses→French-language works237,207→