MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Abstract A025: PicoGen: A structure-grounded generative AI model for drugging undruggable targets, including the TEAD–YAP axis

2025· article· en· W4412163806 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Nicholas Hamilton, Asanga Bandara, Steff De Graef, S.D. Weeks, Ali H. Munawar

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical Cancer Research · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCell Image Analysis Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceMedicineComputational biologyCancer researchBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Despite major advances in structure-enabled and AI-driven drug discovery (AIDD), progress against protein–protein interactions (PPIs) remains a critical bottleneck—especially in oncology, where transcriptional co-activators and signaling hubs often lack defined pockets or tool compounds. A prominent example is TEAD–YAP, a central effector of the Hippo pathway and a validated oncogenic driver in mesothelioma, basal cell carcinoma, and squamous tumors. Despite extensive evidence linking this complex to tumorigenesis, it remains refractory to conventional drug design due to its shallow, featureless interface. Compounding this challenge is the field-wide scarcity of high-resolution ligand–protein structural data, a core bottleneck for training small molecule-focused AI models. Fewer than 12,000 unique ligand-bound proteins exist in the Protein Data Bank (PDB), a fraction of what is needed to train generative machine-learning (ML) models. Structural data is particularly sparse for targets like transcription factors, where ligands are rare or absent. As a result, contemporary AI models trained on legacy ligand-receptor datasets are brittle and limited in their utility against novel, undrugged targets. To address these dual limitations of data scarcity in AIDD and PPI intractability, we developed PicoGen, a foundational generative AI model trained directly on PPI surfaces. Rather than relying on ligand-bound complexes, PicoGen learns transferable features that enable structure-grounded small molecule generation even for completely unliganded targets. It benefits from a carefully curated and dramatically expanded training set that is over 50-fold larger than traditional ligand-based datasets. Free from screening library biases or human design constraints, it operates beyond pre-synthesized chemical space, enabling novel solutions for previously undruggable sites. It also accurately rediscovers known PPI-inhibitor interactions when blinded to ligand information, validating its ability to recover features relevant to drug binding from raw interface geometry. As a proof of concept, we applied PicoGen to the TEAD–YAP interface. The model generated ligands targeting TEAD to disrupt YAP binding at a site distinct from the palmitoylation pocket. Synthesized compounds were validated by differential scanning fluorimetry (DSF), confirming direct TEAD engagement. Binding was retained in a TEAD mutant lacking a functional palmitoylation pocket, confirming alternative site engagement. Structural and functional evaluation of these hits is ongoing to further elucidate their therapeutic potential. Beyond TEAD–YAP, PicoGen supports rapid hit generation across cryptic, uncharacterized or structurally complex targets, producing high-confidence ligands for historically challenging targets including MYC-MAX, MAML1 and STAT3 and other targets relevant to immune evasion. Together, these findings establish PicoGen as a powerful, structure-native, generative platform capable of unlocking elusive therapeutic targets in cancer and across disease areas. Citation Format: Nicholas Hamilton, Asanga Bandara, Steff De Graef, Stephen Weeks, Ali H. Munawar. PicoGen: A structure-grounded generative AI model for drugging undruggable targets, including the TEAD–YAP axis [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference in Cancer Research: Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning; 2025 Jul 10-12; Montreal, QC, Canada. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2025;31(13_Suppl):Abstract nr A025.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.022

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.136
GPT teacher head0.523
Teacher spread0.387 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClinical Cancer Research→Same topicCell Image Analysis Techniques→French-language works237,207→