MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Abstract B059: Cancer Recurrence and Anxiety/Depression: High Accuracy Artificial Intelligence Predictive Modeling

2025· article· en· W4412163810 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Nabil R. Adam, Robert Wieder

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical Cancer Research · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRadiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDepression (economics)AnxietyCancerMedicinePsychiatryClinical psychologyPsychologyOncologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract A. Purpose: Predicting recurrence and survival in individual patients with localized breast cancer will identify circumstance-specific events and interventions that either predispose or prevent recurrence. B. Methods and Procedures: We used the SEER-Medicare linked dataset to investigate women diagnosed with stage I-IV breast cancer who were enrolled at 65 years or older for age eligibility. We collected time-fixed data on patients and cancers at diagnosis and time-varying covariates after diagnosis (e.g., treatments, comorbidities, age, frailty index, adverse events, anxiety, and depression). Our longitudinal data comprised hundreds of thousands of patients with hundreds of millions of records spanning over 20 years. We identified the recurrence of stage I-III disease by documenting new diagnoses of recurrent, contralateral, new chemo-, bio, hormone, or radiotherapy after 4 months following completion of initial therapy, and for all patients, recorded date of death. We have previously demonstrated that combining time-varying with time-fixed covariates into DL modeling of survival for individual patients at all stages results in significant improvements in the model's prediction accuracy (from around 65% to >90%) for stage I-IV patients and considers the impact of subsequent lines of potential individually tailored therapy on survival of stage IV patients. In an earlier study, we extended four deep learning models (DL) to deal with combined time-fixed and time-varying patient covariates to predict survival for individual patients at all stages. The results showed improvements in the model's prediction accuracy (from around 65% to >90%). In this study, we applied four deep learning models (DL) to predict individual patients' recurrence-free survival probabilities in different patient and cancer categories distributed according to race, stage, and hormone receptor status. Results: The predictive accuracy of the models was greater than 95%. Patient recurrence-free survival curves generated by the DL models reveal a vast variability in predicted survival within each broad patient grouping (stage, race, hormone status). Our results show that approximately 36% of the patient population had a diagnosis of anxiety and/or depression, with a higher prevalence in White (W) patients. Our results also demonstrate that the adrenergic stressors, anxiety and depression, previously suspected factors in recurrence, increase the population recurrence rate of dormant breast cancer by 27%. Conclusions: Our modeling confirms the exceptional circumstance-specific variability in interpatient recurrence and survival probabilities. It demonstrates the capacity to model individual patient recurrence and the impact of anxiety/depression as proof of the principle of life events that can affect recurrence from localized breast cancer. The application of these models will serve as a vital tool for testing relevant hypotheses for recurrence-inducing or recurrence-preventing events in individual circumstances that can be tested in clinical trials with a high likelihood of success. Citation Format: Nabil R. Adam, Tarek R. Adam, Robert Wieder. Cancer Recurrence and Anxiety/Depression: High Accuracy Artificial Intelligence Predictive Modeling [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference in Cancer Research: Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning; 2025 Jul 10-12; Montreal, QC, Canada. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2025;31(13_Suppl):Abstract nr B059.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.043
Threshold uncertainty score0.086

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.198
GPT teacher head0.559
Teacher spread0.361 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClinical Cancer ResearchSame topicRadiomics and Machine Learning in Medical ImagingFrench-language works237,207