MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Abstract A038: Unmasking hidden mutational footprints of therapy in pediatric tumors

2025· article· en· W4412163883 on OpenAlexaffabout
Mehdi Layeghifard, Marcos Díaz‐Gay, Pedro L. Ballester, Elli Papaemmanuil, Mark J. Cowley, Anita Villani, Ludmil B. Alexandrov, Adam Shlien

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical Cancer Research · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNeuroblastoma Research and Treatments
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick Children
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCancerCancer researchOncologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The substantial improvement in childhood cancer survival rates has been primarily achieved through therapy intensification, often at the cost of life-long adverse effects. Therapies can be associated with characteristic patterns of mutations found in the tumor genome, known as mutational signatures. These signatures, therefore, can act as markers of resistance and late effects of therapy. We employed a large-scale analysis of 611 whole-genome sequenced pediatric tumors with harmonized therapy data, integrating de novo mutational signature extraction with ensemble machine learning (ML) models trained on comprehensive genomic features (single- and double-base substitutions, indels, structural variants, and copy number alterations) to identify therapy-associated patterns. De novo extraction across single-nucleotide variants, indels, structural variants, and copy number alterations revealed 95 distinct mutational signatures, including 31 novel ones. Platinum therapy was associated with the highest mutagenic burden, with canonical signatures (e.g., SBS31, SBS35, DBS5) detected in 41% of exposed tumors. By aligning with treatment timelines, we defined a median latency of 91 days and a burden threshold of ∼1500 mutations for platinum signatures to emerge—appearing in all osteosarcomas (most common primary bone cancer) and two-thirds of neuroblastomas (most common extracranial solid tumor in children). Despite these insights, the reasons why some tumors do not exhibit these signatures, and how this relates to their response to therapy, remain poorly understood. To uncover subtler therapy-associated signals beyond known COSMIC signatures, we trained ensemble ML models on various types of genomic alterations. Our ML models achieved high predictive performance (F1-score = 0.89) in classifying platinum-exposed tumors. Importantly, predictive accuracy persisted even after masking features corresponding to canonical platinum signatures, indicating the presence of non-canonical mutational patterns. Feature analysis identified biologically plausible non-canonical genomic features enriched in platinum-exposed tumors across pediatric cancers, suggesting previously unannotated mutational footprints of therapy. Notably, ML analysis revealed distinct non-canonical genomic features associated with anthracyclines, and select antimetabolites and alkylating agents, shedding light on therapies previously lacking characterized mutational signatures. These novel genomic signals were also validated across independent pediatric and adult cancer cohorts. This work highlights the power of ML to detect therapy-induced mutational patterns beyond known mutational signatures. As cancer remains the leading cause of disease-related death among children in many countries, this integrated ML-driven approach offers a powerful strategy for improved therapy monitoring, early resistance prediction, and ultimately, the development of more personalized and effective treatment strategies (e.g., stratification and de-escalation) for children with cancer. Citation Format: Mehdi Layeghifard, Marcos Díaz-Gay, Pedro L. Ballester, Elli Papaemmanuil, Mark Cowley, Anita Villani, Ludmil B. Alexandrov, Adam Shlien. Unmasking hidden mutational footprints of therapy in pediatric tumors [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference in Cancer Research: Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning; 2025 Jul 10-12; Montreal, QC, Canada. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2025;31(13_Suppl):Abstract nr A038.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.238
GPT teacher head0.571
Teacher spread0.333 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClinical Cancer ResearchSame topicNeuroblastoma Research and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207