MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412166383 · doi:10.1017/cjn.2025.10291

P.144 Artery of Percheron Infarction following endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery: a case series and literature review

2025· article· en· W4412166383 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Brenda J. Hoffman, AR Rheaume, Katherine Au, Tejas Sankar, Vivek Mehta

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOphthalmology and Eye Disorders
Canadian institutionsAlberta Hospital EdmontonWorkers Compensation Board of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineTranssphenoidal surgeryInfarctionSeries (stratigraphy)SurgeryCardiologyInternal medicineMyocardial infarctionPituitary adenomaGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Artery of Percheron (AOP) infarct is a rare but devastating complication following endoscopic transnasal transsphenoidal surgery (ETTS) for pituitary adenoma resection, characterized by decreased level of consciousness, mydriasis, and cognitive impairment. We reported two new and one remote case in a single institution. Methods: A retrospective case analysis and literature review was conducted. All patients had MRI-confirmed bilateral paramedian thalamic and/or midbrain infarcts following primary or redo ETTS for pituitary adenomas. Results: 8 total cases were identified, with a mean age of 45.8 years (SD: 6.06), including 6 females (75%) and 2 males (25%), undergoing initial (6/8, 75%) or repeat (2/8, 25%) ETTS for pituitary macroadenomas. Tumour consistency was solid in 6/8 (75%), hemorrhagic in 1/8 (12.5%) and cystic in 1/8 (12.5%). MRI showed bilateral paramedian thalamic infarcts (8/8 100%), with midbrain extension in 5/8 (62.5%). Intraoperative CSF leaks occurred in 6 of 8 (75%). The mean Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) score was 3 (range 2-4, SD: 0.37) at a mean follow-up of 8.6 (SD: 5.5) months. Conclusions: AOP infarcts are rare following ETTS for pituitary adenomas. Possible associations include large tumour size, firm consistency, and intraoperative CSF leak. Clinical outcomes are typically poor and characterized by severe long-term disability.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.718
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.004
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences NeurologiquesSame topicOphthalmology and Eye DisordersFrench-language works237,207