F.5 CHange in Optic nerve sheath diameter and Optic disc elevation and risk of Shunt failure in the pediatric Emergency department (CHOOSE study)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Ocular point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) may be a clinically useful method to evaluate shunt dysfunction for children with hydrocephalus in the emergency department (ED). We assessed whether a change in optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD) from prior asymptomatic baseline is associated with shunt failure. Methods: This prospective single center cohort study included asymptomatic shunted children (age 0-18 years). Baseline ocular POCUS was performed in the outpatient neurosurgery clinic; a second POCUS was performed if the patient subsequently presented to the ED with symptoms of shunt failure. Shunt failure was defined by intraoperative confirmation of inadequate CSF flow through the shunt within 96 hours from ED presentation. Results: The primary outcome of intra-operatively confirmed shunt failure occurred in 14/76 (18%) ED patient presentations. ΔONSD in patients with and without shunt failure was 0.89mm and 0.16mm respectively; the mean difference was 0.73mm (95%CI: 0.34-1.12), p=0.0012. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.86, with an optimal cutoff of ≥+0.4mm, corresponding to sensitivity of 0.93, specificity of 0.73, PPV of 0.43, NPV of 0.98. Conclusions: ΔONSD was strongly associated with shunt failure. We found ΔONSD of <+0.4 in symptomatic children with CSF shunts may identify a population that had low likelihood of true shunt failure.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".