MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412166545 · doi:10.1017/cjn.2025.10324

P.187 Development of benign enlargement of subarachnoid spaces growth charts

2025· article· en· W4412166545 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
TM Bitonti, Albert Tu

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicReservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDevelopment (topology)ResizingMedicineBusinessMathematicsMathematical analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Normalized growth curves are an essential component in management of pediatric patients. Benign enlargement of subarachnoid spaces (BESS) is a common condition in infants that results in deviation from expected head growth but does not have long term implications. Differentiating BESS from pathological conditions is critical to minimize unnecessary imaging and specialist evaluations. Standardized growth charts specific to BESS do not exist, complicating monitoring and management. Methods: An analysis of head circumference (HC) data was performed for 315 children aged 0-6 years diagnosed with BESS at CHEO. Growth charts were created using Generalized Additive Models for Location, Scale, and Shape (GAMLSS). Z-scores derived from HC measurements were compared to World Health Organization (WHO) norms, stratified by sex. Results: Benign macrocephalic patients consistently tracked above the 97th percentile of WHO curves, with the 50th percentile in this cohort aligning with the 97th percentile of WHO data. HC growth accelerated in early infancy, stabilizing around ages 2-3. Growth charts demonstrated distinct patterns for BESS compared to normative data. Conclusions: This study provides novel charts for BESS, enabling improved monitoring and clinical management. These charts have the potential to reduce unnecessary imaging and specialist referrals, alleviating anxiety for caregivers and clinicians while optimizing resource use.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.026
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.026

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.026
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences NeurologiquesSame topicReservoir Engineering and Simulation MethodsFrench-language works237,207