Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathies (CIDP) is a rare, acquired polyneuropathy, especially in children, affecting the peripheral nervous system. It most commonly presents in a symmetric, proximal and distal, sensorimotor fashion. Immunosuppression and immunomanipulation are treatment modalities. This is an update of the 14-year-old male presented, at the 2024 CNSF meeting, with severe progressive CIDP who became refractory to steroid and IVIg but responded to Rituximab. Methods: At the age of 16, at a stage of recovery where he had regained MRC grade 5 strength diffusely, all therapies were sequentially tapered (prednisone & IVIg) or withdrawn (rituximab). He did well for approximately 6 months at which point he relapsed severely to the point of needing a walker. Repeat electrodiagnostics confirmed latency, amplitude, and conduction velocity deteriorations as compared to previous. As a result, prednisone, IVIg, and rituximab were reinstated. Results: As per the first exposure to rituximab, the patient began to respond roughly 3 months after the retreatment with targeted anti-CD20 therapy. He has again made a complete recovery physically but not electrophysiologically. This is the same pattern of response that was originally manifested. Conclusions: Rituximab appears to be an effective treatment for severe IVIg-refractory pediatric CIDP.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.007 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".