MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412166692 · doi:10.1017/cjn.2025.10239

P.076 3-year Clinical Lessons Learned from the Alberta Spinal Muscular Atrophy Newborn Screening (SMA-NBS)

2025· article· en· W4412166692 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
JK Mah, Price Tr, Mathilde R. Crone, Hanna Kolski, Fatemeh Dehghan Niri

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNeurogenetic and Muscular Disorders Research
Canadian institutionsAlberta Hospital EdmontonCalgary Laboratory Services
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSpinal muscular atrophySMA*MedicineNewborn screeningPhysical medicine and rehabilitationPhysical therapyPediatricsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is caused by biallelic mutations in the SMN1 gene. Early diagnosis through newborn screening (NBS) and presymptomatic treatment optimize health outcomes. Methods: SMA-NBS began in Alberta on 28February2022. A multiplex quantitative PCR assay detected homozygous deletions of exon 7 in dried blood spot samples. Screen-positive infants underwent genetic confirmation by multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification to determine SMN1/SMN2 copy numbers. We report clinical outcomes of SMA diagnoses through Alberta NBS over 3 years. Results: From 28February2022-31December2024, twelve infants were confirmed SMA positive, including two with 2 SMN2 copies and six with 3 SMN2 copies. Median age at initial positive screen was 6 days (range=3-9), and at diagnosis, 15 days (range=11-27). Seven infants (median age=29 days, range=18-142) received onasemnogene abeparvovec-xioi. Two received nusinersen (Day 22) or risdiplam (Day 72), followed by onasemnogene abeparvovec-xioi (Day 48 and 111, respectively). Two infants received risdiplam after 3 months of age. One infant was symptomatic at treatment initiation. Post-treatment evaluations showed ongoing motor milestone achievements. Conclusions: SMA incidence in Alberta during 2022-2024 was 8.2 (95%CI: 3.5-12.8) cases per 100,000 live births. Efforts continue to shorten age at treatment initiation, especially for those with two SMN2 copies, and to promote uniform coverage for 4-copy cases.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Research integrity
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.094
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.009
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0030.000
Research integrity0.0000.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.108
GPT teacher head0.378
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences NeurologiquesSame topicNeurogenetic and Muscular Disorders ResearchFrench-language works237,207