MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4412168555 · doi:10.1101/2025.07.08.25331130

Altered Network Efficiency in Isolated REM Sleep Behaviour Disorder: A Multicentric Study

2025· preprint· en· W4412168555 on OpenAlexaff
Christina Tremblay, Alexandre Pastor‐Bernier, François Rheault, Véronique Daneault, Violette Ayral, Marie Filiatrault, Liane Desaulniers, Andrew Vo, Jean‐François Gagnon, Ronald B. Postuma, Petr Dušek, Stanislav Mareček, Zsóka Varga, Johannes Klein, Stéphane Lehéricy, Isabelle Arnulf, Pauline Dodet, Marie Vidailhet, Jean-Christophe Corvol

Bibliographic record

VenuemedRxiv · 2025
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicParkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityCanadian Sleep & Circadian NetworkUniversité de MontréalUniversité de SherbrookeHôpital du Sacré-Cœur de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSleep (system call)PsychologyREM sleep behavior disorderCognitive psychologyNeuroscienceComputer sciencePolysomnographyElectroencephalography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Isolated REM sleep behavior disorder (iRBD), a prodromal synucleinopathy, generally precedes Parkinson’s disease (PD) or dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB). While disruptions in structural brain connectivity have been reported in these diseases, their presence in prodromal phases such as iRBD remains unclear. In this cross-sectional study, we analysed diffusion MRI in a large multicentric dataset (198 iRBD, 174 controls), mapping white matter pathways between 462 regions. Comparing groups, we found disrupted structural connectivity in iRBD. This included reduced density in multiple cortical areas alongside focal increases suggesting compensation in parietal, orbitofrontal and visual cortices. Global and local efficiency were altered in iRBD, notably in motor-related regions (putamen, thalamus, sensorimotor and parietal cortices), and was associated with emerging motor features. Importantly, increased local efficiency in the supramarginal gyrus predicted phenoconversion to DLB, but not PD. These findings highlight early structural connectivity disruptions in iRBD, offering a potential marker for progression to DLB.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.291
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuemedRxiv→Same topicParkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments→French-language works237,207→