MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4412172555 · doi:10.2196/64643

Effect of Lifestyle Modification Through Web-Based Telerehabilitation Monitoring Combined With Supervised Sensorimotor Training After Total Knee Arthroplasty: Randomized Controlled Trial

2025· article· en· W4412172555 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Samreen Sadiq, Rabiya Noor, Rizwan Akram

Bibliographic record

VenueJMIR mhealth and uhealth · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTotal Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTelerehabilitationPreprintRandomized controlled trialMedicinePhysical therapyPhysical medicine and rehabilitationArthroplastyTelemedicineComputer scienceHealth careSurgeryWorld Wide Web

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is commonly performed to manage end-stage knee osteoarthritis, yet postsurgical recovery varies significantly among patients. Lifestyle modification and rehabilitation interventions play a critical role in optimizing outcomes. While telerehabilitation has shown promise in enhancing accessibility and compliance, its role in supporting lifestyle behavior change alongside supervised sensorimotor training remains underexplored. Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the effects of a home-based lifestyle modification program delivered through web-based telerehabilitation monitoring in addition to supervised sensorimotor training, in improving physical function, pain, balance, quality of life (QOL), and adherence in patients undergoing TKA. Methods: A single-blinded randomized controlled trial was conducted among 52 participants undergoing primary TKA, who were randomly assigned to either the intervention group (IG) (supervised sensorimotor training plus a telerehabilitation-supported lifestyle modification program) or the control group (CG) (supervised sensorimotor training alone and a traditional home exercise plan). The intervention lasted 22 weeks, and participants were assessed at baseline (presurgery), 14 weeks, and 22 weeks postsurgery. Outcome measures included joint position sense (JPS), musculoskeletal ultrasound of the rectus femoris muscle, Berg Balance Scale, knee function using the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, and QOL via EuroQol 5-dimension 5-level questionnaire. Results: Significant improvements were observed in the IG across all outcomes compared with the CG. Notably, the IG showed greater improvements in musculoskeletal ultrasound thickness. JPS showed superior accuracy in the experimental group (baseline [3.2 degrees] to 22 wk postsurgery [0.05 degrees]) compared with the CG (baseline [3.1 degrees] to 22 wk postsurgery [1.8 degrees]), with significant improvements noted (P=.001, Cohen d=3.1 vs 0.7), Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score subscales (pain, symptoms, activities of daily living, sport, and QOL), and JPS (mean absolute error 0.05 vs 1.8 degrees). Berg Balance Scale demonstrated significant gains in balance for the experimental group (baseline [34] to 22 wk postsurgery [53]) relative to the CG (baseline [37] to 22 wk postsurgery [48]), with substantial differences observed (P=.001, Cohen d=1.8 vs 0.4). The EuroQol 5-dimension 5-level questionnaire health-related QOL scores were markedly higher for the experimental group (baseline [45.4] to 22 wk postsurgery [88.1]) compared with the CG (baseline [42.8] to 22 wk postsurgery [70.9]), indicating substantial gains in overall health status (P=.001, Cohen d=2.4 vs 1.3). The IG also reported higher compliance, with 81.8% (18/22) achieving over 90% adherence compared with 68.18% (15/22) in the CG. Conclusions: Home-based lifestyle modification program through telerehabilitation monitoring significantly improved functional and patient-reported outcomes in individuals following TKA. These findings support the integration of lifestyle modification programs through telerehabilitation monitoring into post-TKA recovery pathways to optimize rehabilitation outcomes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.028

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0070.004
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.334
Teacher spread0.315 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJMIR mhealth and uhealth→Same topicTotal Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes→French-language works237,207→