MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412173024 · doi:10.1136/bmjgh-2024-018577

Equity of maternal and child health services in Afghanistan: a spatiotemporal analysis of national survey datasets

2025· article· en· W4412173024 on OpenAlexaff
Tim Groteclaes, Saifuddin Ahmed, Cauane Blumenberg, Aluísio J. D. Barros, Mickey Chopra, Nadia Akseer

Bibliographic record

VenueBMJ Global Health · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGlobal Maternal and Child Health
Canadian institutionsCanadian Sleep Society
FundersBill and Melinda Gates Foundation
KeywordsEquity (law)Maternal healthChild healthPublic healthPolitical scienceEnvironmental healthHealth servicesRegional scienceGeographyMedicineFamily medicineNursing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

INTRODUCTION: Afghanistan's healthcare system faces geopolitical instability and inequities in maternal and child health (MCH) services, particularly associated with a temporary collapse in funding in 2021. We analysed coverage levels and spatiotemporal trends in sociodemographic inequalities in the country using data from the 2010/2011 and 2022/2023 Afghan Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys. METHODS: The study's primary outcome was an adapted Composite Coverage Index (CCI) that combined seven essential MCH interventions with corresponding inequality measures, evaluated using Slope Indices of Inequality. These interventions included antenatal care, skilled birth attendance (SBA), Bacillus-Calmette-Guérin (BCG), diphtheria-pertussis-tetanus, and measles vaccination and treatment for suspected pneumonia and diarrhoea. Inequalities were analysed across wealth, education and urban/rural status at both national and provincial levels. RESULTS: The analysis revealed persistent socioeconomic inequalities across all strata, with the most significant economic disparities observed in SBA and the largest educational disparities in vaccine coverage in 2022/2023. Nationally, the CCI increased by 4.2% from 42.1% (95% CI 40.3% to 44%) in 2010/2011 to 46.2% (95% CI 44.6% to 47.9%) in 2022/2023. Despite a slight increase between the two studies, severe regional disparities are masked, particularly in the eastern and southern regions, where coverage across multiple interventions significantly declined. The provinces of Nooristan and Urozgan significantly lost coverage, while Daykundi and Nimroz recorded increases in coverage and equity. CONCLUSION: The findings underscore the persistence of substantial inequalities in Afghanistan, with severe consequences for already vulnerable populations facing multiple hardships. The findings highlight ways in which geopolitical instability affects healthcare equity. Increasing disparities threaten to exacerbate existing challenges in accessing essential healthcare services, particularly for those of lower socioeconomic status. Urgent, targeted interventions are necessary to address these inequities, the impacts associated with funding cuts and gender marginalisation, and to mitigate their detrimental impact on Afghan women and children.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.159
Threshold uncertainty score0.316

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.014
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.434
Teacher spread0.404 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBMJ Global HealthSame topicGlobal Maternal and Child HealthFrench-language works237,207