MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412173070 · doi:10.1136/bmjgh-2024-016339

Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy and perinatal outcomes: two prospective cohort studies of nulliparous women in India and Tanzania

2025· article· en· W4412173070 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Andrea B. Pembe, Pratibha Dwarkanath, Amani Kikula, John Michael Raj, Nandita Perumal, Heavenlight A. Paulo, Rajalakshmi Mahendran, Christopher Duggan, Honorati Masanja, N. N. Chopra, Mary M. Sando, Tinku Thomas, Cara A. Yelverton, Alfa Muhihi, Anura V. Kurpad, Wafaie W. Fawzi, Blair J. Wylie, Christopher R. Sudfeld

Bibliographic record

VenueBMJ Global Health · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPregnancy and preeclampsia studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchNational Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney DiseasesBill and Melinda Gates Foundation
KeywordsTanzaniaMedicineObstetricsProspective cohort studyPregnancyGynecologyCohort studyCohortInternal medicineGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

INTRODUCTION: Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP) have been linked with increased risk for maternal and offspring complications in high-income settings. However, in resource-limited settings, studies with robust measurement of HDP, including severity and timing, and perinatal outcomes are limited. METHODS: We analysed data from two prospective cohorts of nulliparous women in India (n=10 570 pregnancies) and Tanzania (n=10 299 pregnancies) who were enrolled in calcium supplementation trials and had blood pressure and proteinuria assessments throughout pregnancy and at the time of labour and delivery. Generalised estimating equations were used to assess the relationship between HDP severity categories (gestational hypertension, preeclampsia without severe features and preeclampsia with severe features) and timing of HDP onset (early-onset <34 weeks vs late-onset ≥34 weeks gestation) with adverse perinatal outcomes. RESULTS: The cumulative incidence of HDP was 3.7% and 4.5% in the India and Tanzania cohorts, respectively. All HDP severity categories were associated with a significantly higher risk for perinatal death in both cohorts (p values<0.05). Pregnancies complicated by pre-eclampsia with severe features had the largest magnitude of increased risk for perinatal death as compared with pregnancies without an HDP (India RR 8.60; 95% CI 5.90 to 12.53; Tanzania RR 4.05; 95% CI 2.91 to 5.66). In both cohorts, pre-eclampsia with and without severe features, but not gestational hypertension, was associated with increased risks for preterm birth and low birth weight. Pregnancies with early-onset HDP had a high absolute risk of perinatal death (India 25.6% and Tanzania 36.9%), and the risk was markedly increased as compared with late-onset HDP (India RR 4.79; 95% CI 2.68 to 8.54; Tanzania RR 5.79; 95% CI 3.56 to 9.41). CONCLUSION: HDP were differentially associated with risks for perinatal outcomes by severity and timing of onset. Interventions that prevent, reduce the severity or delay the onset of HDP may improve perinatal outcomes in resource-limited settings. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03350516.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.046
Threshold uncertainty score0.091

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.366
Teacher spread0.350 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBMJ Global HealthSame topicPregnancy and preeclampsia studiesFrench-language works237,207