MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412177683 · doi:10.1186/s13014-025-02685-w

Prediction of health-related quality-of-life results after lung stereotactic body radiotherapy using dose-volume parameters from functional mapping on Gallium-68 perfusion PET/CT

2025· article· en· W4412177683 on OpenAlexaff
François Lucia, Margaux Geier, Vincent Bourbonne, Fanny Pinot, Malik Nebbache, Frédérique Blanc-Béguin, Simon Hennebicq, Maëlle Mauguen, K. Kerleguer, Ulrike Schick, Olivier Pradier, Grégoire Le Gal, Pierre‐Yves Salaün, David Bourhis, Pierre‐Yves Le Roux

Bibliographic record

VenueRadiation Oncology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsOttawa HospitalUniversity of Ottawa
FundersLigue Contre le Cancer
KeywordsMedicineNuclear medicineRadiation therapyRadiologyPerfusionStereotactic radiotherapyLung cancerLungPerfusion scanningVolume (thermodynamics)Medical physicsRadiosurgeryOncologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Ga-perfusion PET/CT in the lung stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) planning process in preserving functional lung volumes while respecting target volume coverage and doses to other organs at risk. Here we report the prespecified exploratory endpoint of SBRT on health-related quality of life (HRQoL). METHODS: In this single-center prospective study, we recruited patients planned to be treated in our radiotherapy department with SBRT for primary or secondary lung tumors. Patient-reported outcomes were assessed at the first visit, 1 month, 3 months and every 3 months until 12 months after SBRT using the European Organisation for the Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 items (QLQ-C30), the EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire Lung Cancer 13 items (QLQ-LC13), and the European Quality of Life 5 Dimensions-5 Level (EQ-5D-5 L) questionnaire. The key exploratory HRQoL endpoints (analyzed for all patients who completed at least QLQ-C30 at least one time point after SBRT) were baseline-to-early change (between 1 month and 3 month) and baseline-to-late change (between 6 month and 12 month) in the QLQ-C30 global health status (GHS)/quality-of-life (QoL) score and in the deterioration of the dyspnea (patient-reported lung toxicity). Explorative analysis of the impact of baseline HRQoL, patient- and SBRT-related characteristics, including PET perfusion-based functional parameters, on the change in HRQoL from baseline was analyzed using univariate analysis. RESULTS: Of the 60 patients included, 39 were analyzable as early-onset and 22 as late-onset. Thirteen (33%) and 7 (32%) patients had a deterioration of QoL. In univariate analysis, maximal dose to the heart, doses to the functional lung volume and pulmonary functional test parameters were significantly associated with the early deterioration of HRQoL. Only doses to the functional lung volume were significantly associated with the late deterioration of HRQoL. CONCLUSION: In our study, increased radiation doses in functional lung volume PET bases dose parameters were significantly associated with a decrease of HRQoL unlike anatomic lung parameters. Functional lung avoidance planning guided by perfusion PET/CT may be a simple and noninvasive method to improve HRQoL in patients treated with lung SBRT.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.703

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.058
GPT teacher head0.356
Teacher spread0.298 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRadiation OncologySame topicLung Cancer Diagnosis and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207