MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412183617 · doi:10.1088/1361-6560/adee75

Development and characterization of the Hydra: a novel multi-headed, single optical channel scintillation detector

2025· article· en· W4412183617 on OpenAlexafffund
Boby Lessard, Yoan LeChasseur, Simon Lambert‐Girard, François Therriault‐Proulx, Luc Beaulieu, Louis Archambault

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysics in Medicine and Biology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicRadiation Detection and Scintillator Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversité LavalQuébec Metro High Tech Park (Canada)Theratechnologies (Canada)Hôtel-Dieu de Québec
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsDetectorScintillationLernaean HydraChannel (broadcasting)Characterization (materials science)OpticsPhysicsScintillation counterScintillatorComputer scienceTelecommunicationsBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Objective. Plastic scintillation detectors (PSDs) possess many properties (small size, water-equivalence, real-time reading) that make them well suited for dosimetric applications in radiotherapy. Multi-point PSDs (mPSDs) further enhance capabilities of PSDs, incorporating multiple detection points cascaded within a single collecting optical fiber in order to provide more spatial information about the radiation field. The goal of this study was to develop and characterize a novel mPSD design, called Hydra, that possesses multiple optical fiber heads connected to a single optical fiber. Each head tip includes a single scintillating element, allowing to measure the dose simultaneously at three independent locations in space. Approach. The Hydra design consists of three Medscint proprietary scintillators with emission peaks at 434, 428 and 530 nm. The optical fibers of each head and the collecting fiber are made of PMMA (ESKA GH-4001, Mitsubitshi Chemical Co., Tokyo, Japan). The Hydra was used to measure output factors, dose profiles and percent-depth-dose (PDD) curves in water under a 6 MV photon beam, individually for each head as well as with all three heads in the irradiation beam. Main results. The deviation on output factors, when all three heads are in the irradiation field, remains within ±1.1% as compared to when only 1 head is in the irradiation field. For the profile and PDD curves, the deviation with the reference curves remains within ±2% in the high-dose and low-gradient regions. Significance. The Hydra offers a good control on the uniformity of light intensity coming from each scintillator, a freedom to measure independently in a non-contiguous space, and an easier and more accurate calibration procedure compared to previous mPSD designs. These advantages open the door to new possibilities for multi-point dosimetry applications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.447
Threshold uncertainty score0.186

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.128
GPT teacher head0.329
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysics in Medicine and BiologySame topicRadiation Detection and Scintillator TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207