Unique nicotinic responses are present in distinct subtypes of mouse medial prefrontal layer V pyramidal neurons
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The neurotransmitter acetylcholine supports goal-directed cognitive functions via activation of its nicotinic and muscarinic classes of receptors within the prefrontal cortex. These receptors are expressed on pyramidal neurons located within layer V of the prefrontal cortex, which integrate afferent signals and contribute toward cognitive circuits via efferent projections to cortical and subcortical targets. Using whole-cell electrophysiology, retrograde labelling, and neuron reconstruction in the juvenile mouse prefrontal cortex, we identified three unique nicotinic receptor responses that are present in distinct subtypes of layer V pyramidal neurons. Broadly, we observed responses mediated by (i) postsynaptic α7 nicotinic receptors in burst-firing neurons that project to the contralateral cortex, (ii) a combination of postsynaptic α7 and presynaptic β2* nicotinic receptors in burst-firing neurons that project to the nucleus accumbens, and (iii) postsynaptic β2* nicotinic receptors in regular-firing neurons that project to the ventromedial thalamus. These findings provide insight into a mechanism by which nicotinic acetylcholine neurotransmission may support cognitive functions via the unique receptor isoform responses found in distinct efferent projections from this brain region.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".