Porous-Cladding Polydimethylsiloxane Optical Waveguide for Biomedical Pressure Sensing Applications
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We report a new concept of a pressure sensor fully made from polydimethylsiloxane with a solid core and porous cladding that operates through (frustrated) total internal reflection. A flexible and sensitive rectangular cross-section waveguide was fabricated via the casting and molding method. The waveguide's optical losses can be temperature-controlled during the fabrication process by controlling the quantity of microbubbles incorporated (2% approximately for samples made at 70 °C). By controlling the precuring temperature, the microbubbles are incorporated into the waveguides during the simple and cost-effective fabrication process through the casting and molding method. For these samples, we measured good optical loss tradeoff of the order of 1.85 dB/cm, which means that it is possible to fabricate a solid-core/clad waveguide with porous cladding able to guide light properly. We demonstrated the microbubble concentration control in the waveguide, and we measured an average diameter of 239 ± 16 µm. A sensitivity to pressure of 0.1035 dB/kPa optical power loss was measured. The results show that in a biomedical dynamic pressure range (0 to 13.3 kPa), this new device indicates the critical pressure threshold level, which constitutes a crucial asset for potential applications such as pressure injury prevention.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".