Phoneme-Aware Hierarchical Augmentation and Semantic-Aware SpecAugment for Low-Resource Cantonese Speech Recognition
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cantonese Automatic Speech Recognition (ASR) is hindered by tonal complexity, acoustic diversity, and a lack of labelled data. This study proposes a phoneme-aware hierarchical augmentation framework that enhances performance without additional annotation. A Phoneme Substitution Matrix (PSM), built from Montreal Forced Aligner alignments and Tacotron-2 synthesis, injects adversarial phoneme variants into both transcripts and their aligned audio segments, enlarging pronunciation diversity. Concurrently, a semantic-aware SpecAugment scheme exploits wav2vec 2.0 attention heat maps and keyword boundaries to adaptively mask informative time-frequency regions; a reinforcement-learning controller tunes the masking schedule online, forcing the model to rely on a wider context. On the Common Voice Cantonese 50 h subset, the combined strategy reduces the character error rate (CER) from 26.17% to 16.88% with wav2vec 2.0 and from 38.83% to 23.55% with Zipformer. At 100 h, the CER further drops to 4.27% and 2.32%, yielding relative gains of 32-44%. Ablation studies confirm that phoneme-level and masking components provide complementary benefits. The framework offers a practical, model-independent path toward accurate ASR for Cantonese and other low-resource tonal languages. This paper presents an intelligent sensing-oriented modeling framework for speech signals, which is suitable for deployment on edge or embedded systems to process input from audio sensors (e.g., microphones) and shows promising potential for voice-interactive terminal applications.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".