MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412195391 · doi:10.2196/70940

Extracting Symptoms of Complex Conditions From Online Discourse (Subreddit to Symptomatology): Lexicon-Based Approach

2025· article· en· W4412195391 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Bushra Hossain, Sarah Masud Preum, Md. Fazle Rabbi, R Ara, Mohammed Eunus Ali

Bibliographic record

VenueJMIR Medical Informatics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicMental Health via Writing
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Institute on Drug Abuse
KeywordsPreprintLexiconLinguisticsComputer scienceNatural language processingArtificial intelligencePsychologyWorld Wide WebPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Millions of people affected with complex medical conditions with diverse symptoms often turn to online discourse to share their experiences. While some studies have explored natural language processing methods and medical information extraction tools, these typically focus on generic symptoms in clinical notes and struggle to identify patient-reported, disease-specific, subtle symptoms from online health discourse. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to extract patient-reported, disease-specific symptoms shared on social media reflecting the lived experiences of thousands of affected individuals and explore the characteristics, prevalence, and occurrence patterns of the symptoms. METHODS: We propose a lexicon-based symptom extraction (LSE) method to identify a diverse list of disease-specific, patient-reported symptoms. We initially used a large language model to accelerate the extraction of symptom-related key phrases that formed the lexicon. We evaluated the effectiveness of lexicon extraction against human annotation using a Jaccard index score. We then leveraged BERT-Base, BioBERT, and Phrase-BERT-based embeddings to learn representations of these symptom-related key phrases and cluster similar symptoms using k-means and hierarchical density-based spatial clustering of applications with noise (HDBSCAN). Among the different options explored in our experiments, BioBERT-based k-means clustering was found to be the most effective. Finally, we applied symptom normalization to eliminate duplicate and redundant entries in the comprehensive symptom list. RESULTS: -scores (mean 86.10) than automatic medical extraction tools and large language models, respectively. Notably, the comprehensive list of 64 PCOS symptoms generated via LSE ensured extensive coverage of symptoms reported in 7 reputable eHealth forums. Analyzing PCOS symptomatology revealed 28 potentially emerging symptoms and 8 self-reported comorbidities co-occurring with PCOS. CONCLUSIONS: The comprehensive patient-reported, disease-specific symptom list can help patients and health practitioners resolve uncertainties surrounding the disease, eliminating the variability of PCOS symptoms prevailing in the community. Analyzing PCOS symptomatology across varied dimensions provides valuable insights for public health research.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0080.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.430
Teacher spread0.388 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJMIR Medical InformaticsSame topicMental Health via WritingFrench-language works237,207