Effect of vitamin D3 supplementation starting mid-pregnancy on placental angiogenic factors and terminal villi: a secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial in Bangladesh
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Angiogenesis is essential for placental growth and development. Improper placental vascular development can reduce blood flow to the fetus and increase the risk of adverse pregnancy and birth outcomes. The objectives of this study were to examine the effect of prenatal vitamin D supplementation on placental angiogenic factors and terminal villi, and associations between angiogenic factors, terminal villi and birth outcomes. This is a secondary analysis using data and specimens from the Maternal Vitamin D for Infant Growth trial in Dhaka, Bangladesh ( n = 1298). Participants were enrolled at 17–24 weeks gestation and randomized to receive (IU/week): placebo, 4200, 16,800 or 28,000 vitamin D 3 supplement until birth. Newborns and placentas were measured at birth. We examined a subset of randomly selected placentas ( n = 80). Tissue sections were evaluated for vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF-A) and placental growth factor (PlGF) using immunofluorescence. We measured intensity and percent area of expression for angiogenic factors, and total number and surface area of terminal villi. Vitamin D treatment effect was estimated using ANOVA. Regression models were used to assess associations of markers of placental angiogenesis with birth outcomes. Interactions by infant sex were examined. The overall mean (SD) percent area of expression was 17.0 (4.0) for VEGF-A and 15.0 (1.9) for PlGF. The mean (SD) number of terminal villi was 39 (15) per 12 in 2 , and surface area was 0.096 (0.040) in 2 . Vitamin D treatment groups were similar to placebo for all outcomes. No associations were observed between angiogenic factors or terminal villi placental and birth outcomes. Vitamin D supplementation starting from mid-pregnancy until birth did not affect expression of two key angiogenic factors or terminal villi in the placenta. Placental angiogenic factors or terminal villi did not have an association with birth outcomes. These results do not support a role of maternal vitamin D starting mid-pregnancy in impacting placental development.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".