MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412196660 · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2025.115952

Testosterone and 17β-estradiol regulate hippocampal area CA3 sharp waves in male and female rats

2025· article· en· W4412196660 on OpenAlexaff
Patrice Pearce, John J. LaFrancois, Vanessa A. Skucas, Daniel J. Friedman, André A. Fenton, Dino Dvořák, Neil J. MacLusky, Helen E. Scharfman

Bibliographic record

VenueCell Reports · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHypothalamic control of reproductive hormones
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
FundersNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and StrokeNational Institutes of HealthNew York State Office of Mental Health
KeywordsInternal medicineTestosterone (patch)Hippocampal formationEndocrinologyHippocampusHypothalamic–pituitary–gonadal axisBiologyHormoneMedicineLuteinizing hormone

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Sharp wave-ripples (SPW-Rs) are critical to hippocampal function, and the same is true of gonadal steroids, but the interactions are unclear. We find that surgical removal of the gonads greatly reduces SPW rates in both sexes. Ripples are greatly reduced also. Testosterone treatment rescues SPW and ripple rates in males, and 17β-estradiol restores SPW rates in females. We also find that male SPW rates are higher than females but have less power. Furthermore, in intact females, SPW rates fluctuate with the stage of the ovarian cycle. These data demonstrate that hippocampal SPWs are significantly affected by gonadal removal, testosterone, and 17β-estradiol. In addition, there are sex differences. The data are consistent with past demonstrations that testosterone and 17β-estradiol play central roles in hippocampus and significantly expand the views of hormone action and SPW-Rs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCell ReportsSame topicHypothalamic control of reproductive hormonesFrench-language works237,207