MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4412196929 · doi:10.3390/jcm14144879

The Influence of Diabetes on Orthodontic Treatment: A Systematic Review of the Clinical Considerations and Challenges in Response

2025· review· en· W4412196929 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Paula García-Rios, Francisco Javier Rodríguez‐Lozano, Julia Guerrero‐Gironés, Ricardo Elías Oñate Sánchez, Nuria Pérez-Guzmán

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Medicine · 2025
Typereview
Languageen
FieldDentistry
TopicOral microbiology and periodontitis research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineDiabetes mellitusSystematic reviewCritical appraisalCochrane LibraryDentistryMEDLINEChecklistEvidence-based dentistryScopusIntensive care medicinePhysical therapyInternal medicineAlternative medicineRandomized controlled trialPathologyEndocrinology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background/Objectives: Diabetes mellitus is defined as a group of metabolic diseases characterized by chronically elevated blood glucose levels. This condition influences the course of orthodontic treatment, as it affects various clinical aspects of the patient that must be taken into consideration prior to initiation. Therefore, achieving adequate control and management of diabetic patients undergoing orthodontic therapy is essential. This article presents a qualitative synthesis of studies addressing how diabetes affects orthodontic treatments, emphasizing the importance of understanding the necessary considerations prior to initiating treatment and how to manage potential complications. Methods: This systematic review was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. A database search was performed on 5 May 2025, in PubMed, Scopus, Scielo, and The Cochrane Library, using terms related to “diabetes mellitus” and “orthodontic treatments”. Studies meeting the search criteria were included, particularly those that were published in the past ten years and reported on the influence of diabetes on orthodontic treatment. The quality of the case–control studies was assessed using the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale (NOS); for cross-sectional studies, the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) critical appraisal checklist was used; and for experimental studies, the SYRCLE’s Risk of Bias Tool was applied. Results: Fourteen studies ultimately met the inclusion criteria. The evidence showed that diabetes increases gingival bleeding due to elevated levels of advanced glycation end-products (AGEs) and pro-inflammatory cytokines; reduces the efficiency of tooth movement; increases root resorption and affects bone remodeling; and compromises both periodontal and pulpal responses, thereby hindering tissue regeneration. It was also observed that the use of insulin or antidiabetic agents such as metformin may partially mitigate these adverse effects. Conclusions: This systematic review reveals a clear relationship between diabetes and various clinical aspects that influence the progression of orthodontic treatments. Nonetheless, further studies are needed to better understand the impact of this systemic condition on dental treatment outcomes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.017
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.069
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: Systematic review
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.091

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0170.069
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0080.009
Bibliometrics0.0090.012
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.299
GPT teacher head0.535
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical Medicine→Same topicOral microbiology and periodontitis research→French-language works237,207→