MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4412196995 · doi:10.3390/jcm14144920

Anxiety and Depressive Symptoms Post-COVID-19 Pandemic Onset in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients: Canadian Repeated Cross-Sectional Study

2025· article· en· W4412196995 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Jad Fadlallah, Vishva Shah, Ana Samudio, Tom Blydt‐Hansen, István Mucsi

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Medicine · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicCOVID-19 and Mental Health
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaUniversity Health Network
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchHealth CanadaKidney Foundation of Canada
KeywordsMedicineAnxietyCross-sectional studyDepression (economics)Internal medicinePandemicYoung adultCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)PsychiatryDiseasePathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Solid Organ Transplant Recipients (SOTRs) face an elevated risk of Sars-CoV-2 infection and poor outcomes if they contract the infection. This can induce or exacerbate anxiety and depressive symptoms. We used the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Anxiety (A) and Depression (D) scores to conduct a repeated cross-sectional (“pseudo-longitudinal”) comparison of SOTRs’ anxiety and depressive symptoms before and after the COVID-19 pandemic onset. Methods: This secondary analysis used cross-sectional data from a convenience sample of adult SOTRs (kidney, kidney–pancreas, and liver) recruited between 2016 and 2024. The exposure was categorized as follows: “Pandemic Experience” was categorized as PRE (pre-pandemic reference; transplanted and anxiety and depressive symptoms assessed pre-pandemic onset), POST-1 (transplanted before and assessed after onset), and POST-2 (transplanted and assessed after onset). The outcomes were PROMIS-A and PROMIS-D scores. The differences were assessed using multivariable linear regression-estimated means. Results: Of the 816 participants, 588 (72%) were PRE, 135 (17%) were POST-1, and 93 (11%) were POST-2. In the fully adjusted model, the POST-2 group had significantly higher PROMIS-A scores (more severe symptoms) compared with PRE (adjusted mean [95% CI]: 54.2 [52.3; 56.1] vs. 51.7 [50.9; 52.4], p = 0.02). The proportion of patients with potentially clinically significant anxiety was also higher in the POST-2 group, compared with PRE (OR [95%CI] 1.59 [1.0; 2.5]). The PROMIS-A scores were similar between PRE and POST-1, and between POST-1 and POST-2. The PROMIS-D scores were not different across the exposure groups. Conclusions: SOTRs transplanted after the pandemic onset experienced more anxiety but similar depression symptoms compared with pre-pandemic levels. Future research should explore mental health support for SOTRs during crisis situations involving infectious risk.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.154
Threshold uncertainty score0.309

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.105
GPT teacher head0.527
Teacher spread0.422 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical Medicine→Same topicCOVID-19 and Mental Health→French-language works237,207→