MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412200229 · doi:10.1136/bmjment-2025-301725

Association of hyperactivity–impulsivity and inattention symptom profiles with suicide attempt: an 18-year population-based cohort study

2025· article· en· W4412200229 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Michel Spodenkiewicz, Ayla Inja, Samuele Cortese, Cédric Galéra, Isabelle Ouellet‐Morin, Sylvana M. Côté, Michel Boivin, Frank Vitaro, Mara Brendgen, Ginette Dionne, Johanne Renaud, Richard E. Tremblay, Gustavo Turecki, Marie‐Claude Geoffroy, Massimiliano Orri

Bibliographic record

VenueBMJ Mental Health · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAttention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
Canadian institutionsUniversité LavalUniversité de MontréalUniversité du Québec à MontréalCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-JustineInternational Centre for Comparative CriminologyMcGill UniversityDouglas Mental Health University Institute
FundersEuropean Research Executive AgencySocial Sciences and Humanities Research Council of CanadaNational Institute for Health and Care Research
KeywordsImpulsivityLongitudinal studyAttention deficit hyperactivity disorderPoison controlSuicide attemptPsychologyPopulationCohortPsychiatryCohort studyInjury preventionSuicide preventionClinical psychologyMedicineInternal medicineMedical emergency

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) symptomatology in childhood is associated with a high risk of suicide attempt later in life. However, symptom presentation in ADHD is heterogeneous, and little is known about how suicide risk varies according to different profiles of ADHD symptoms and sex. OBJECTIVE: The aim was to investigate the longitudinal associations between childhood profiles of ADHD symptoms (ie, hyperactivity-impulsivity and inattention) and youth suicide attempt in males and females, separately. METHODS: This population-based cohort study used data from three longitudinal cohorts: the Quebec Longitudinal Study of Child Development (QLSCD), the Quebec Longitudinal Study of Kindergarten Children (QLSKC) and the Quebec Newborn Twin Study (QNTS) for a total of 4399 participants (1490 from the QLSCD, 2134 from the QLSKC and 775 from the QNTS; 50% females) followed up from ages 6-23 years. Symptoms of hyperactivity-impulsivity and inattention were assessed by teachers five times from ages 6-12 years. Suicide attempt in adolescence and young adulthood (by age 23) was self-reported. Multitrajectory modelling was used to identify profiles of ADHD symptoms, and regression analysis was used to test their association with suicide attempt, adjusting for childhood socioeconomic and clinical characteristics. FINDINGS: We identified four ADHD symptom profiles with distinct associations with suicide attempt for males and females. Compared with those with persistently low symptoms, females with persistently high inattention and hyperactivity-impulsivity (OR: 2.54, CI 1.39 to 4.63) or high inattention and low hyperactivity-impulsivity (OR: 1.81, CI 1.21 to 2.70) were at higher risk of suicide attempt, while, among males, only those with decreasing hyperactivity-impulsivity and inattention over time (OR: 2.23, CI 1.20 to 4.13) were at higher risk of suicide attempt. CONCLUSIONS: Risk of suicide attempt in children with ADHD symptoms varies according to both symptom profile and sex, the highest risk being for females with high inattention symptoms (with or without hyperactivity), and males with decreasing symptoms. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Taking into account differences in both sex and ADHD symptoms profile may be relevant to more accurately identify and manage suicide risk in individuals with high ADHD symptoms, though caution is needed when generalising our population-based findings to clinical populations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.670

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.388
Teacher spread0.364 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBMJ Mental HealthSame topicAttention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderFrench-language works237,207