Dual-Branch Luminance–Chrominance Attention Network for Hydraulic Concrete Image Enhancement
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Hydraulic concrete is a critical infrastructure material, with its surface condition playing a vital role in quality assessments for water conservancy and hydropower projects. However, images taken in complex hydraulic environments often suffer from degraded quality due to low lighting, shadows, and noise, making it difficult to distinguish defects from the background and thereby hindering accurate defect detection and damage evaluation. In this study, following systematic analyses of hydraulic concrete color space characteristics, we propose a Dual-Branch Luminance–Chrominance Attention Network (DBLCANet-HCIE) specifically designed for low-light hydraulic concrete image enhancement. Inspired by human visual perception, the network simultaneously improves global contrast and preserves fine-grained defect textures, which are essential for structural analysis. The proposed architecture consists of a Luminance Adjustment Branch (LAB) and a Chroma Restoration Branch (CRB). The LAB incorporates a Luminance-Aware Hybrid Attention Block (LAHAB) to capture both the global luminance distribution and local texture details, enabling adaptive illumination correction through comprehensive scene understanding. The CRB integrates a Channel Denoiser Block (CDB) for channel-specific noise suppression and a Frequency-Domain Detail Enhancement Block (FDDEB) to refine chrominance information and enhance subtle defect textures. A feature fusion block is designed to fuse and learn the features of the outputs from the two branches, resulting in images with enhanced luminance, reduced noise, and preserved surface anomalies. To validate the proposed approach, we construct a dedicated low-light hydraulic concrete image dataset (LLHCID). Extensive experiments conducted on both LOLv1 and LLHCID benchmarks demonstrate that the proposed method significantly enhances the visual interpretability of hydraulic concrete surfaces while effectively addressing low-light degradation challenges.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".