MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4412201927 · doi:10.32629/jcmr.v6i2.4039

Association of Coagulation Disorder with the Severity and Mortality of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19): A Meta-Analysis

2025· article· en· W4412201927 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Suzhen Zhang, Hua Jiang

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Medicine Research · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCOVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)Medicine2019-20 coronavirus outbreakCoronavirusSevere acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)Meta-analysisBetacoronavirusDiseaseCoronavirus InfectionsCoagulation DisorderVirologyCoagulationInternal medicineOutbreakInfectious disease (medical specialty)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) , a significant health concern in recent years, is known for its multiple complications. Coagulation disorder is a prevalent complication among patients with COVID-19, but the association of coagulation disorder with the severity and mortality of COVID-19 is still unclear. The object of this study is to ascertain the potential association between coagulation disorder and severity and mortality of COVID-19. Methods: We conducted a systemic literature search of the CNKI, PubMed, Cochrane Library,and Web of Science databases for all relevant studies up to October 1, 2024. All the articles published were retrieved without language restriction. Meta-analysis were performed by Stata 18.0 software. The Newcastle Ottawa scale was used to assess the quality of the included studies. The funnel plot, Egger’s regression asymmetry test, and Begg’s test used to measure the bias of publications. Results: Eighteen studies comprising 2,577 COVID-19 patients were included. Six studies was associated with the mortality of COVID-19, indicating significant differences in DD (SMD: 0.81, 95% confidence interval [CI](0.48-1.14), P=0.02, I2=63.82%); APTT (SMD: 0.37, 95% confidence interval [CI](-0.12-0.86), P=0.14, I2=86.85%); PT (SMD: 0.74, 95% confidence interval [CI](0.34-1.15), P=0.00, I2=70.28%) . Twelve studies was associated with the severity of COVID-19, indicating significant differences in DD (SMD: 1.39, 95% confidence interval [CI](0.93-1.86), P=0.00, I2=93.49%); FIB (SMD: 0.63, 95% confidence interval [CI](0.30-0.96), P=0.00, I2=86.32%); PT (SMD: 0.43, 95% confidence interval [CI](0.12-0.74), P=0.01, I2=82.73%) . Conclusions: The findings confirm that coagulation disorder is associated with severity and mortality of COVID-19. Therefore, it is imperative to monitor blood coagulation indicator and administer treatments in COVID-19 to reduce the severity and mortality.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.015
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.031
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Meta-analysis · Consensus signal: Meta-analysis
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.079

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0150.031
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0150.057
Bibliometrics0.0060.006
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0030.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.463
GPT teacher head0.652
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designMeta-analysis
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical Medicine Research→Same topicCOVID-19 Clinical Research Studies→French-language works237,207→