D7.6 – Demo site report #6 N. Denmark
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Deliverable 7.6 (Demo site report #6 N. Denmark) is part of WP7 (Demonstration in operational environment). The report is public. The aim of T7.6 is to support the integration of the two NZEB residential single-family buildings into the PRELUDE platform and to integrate into these buildings, under real operation, the identified PRELUDE technologies. Data from the Danish demonstrations was also used for the development/validation of the PRELUDE technologies whenever possible. This reportsummarizes also the requirements and expectations of the Danish NZEB buildings for bothenergy use and IEQ. These are considered common for both buildings.<br/><br/>The report summarizes and elaborates on the motivation to use the selected demonstration cases for the enablers developed by PRELUDE and defines the intervention plans and the rationale for implementing or not the individual solutions developed by PRELUDE .<br/><br/>The task was to document the state of the buildings, their systems and the modifications that were carried out from the beginning of the project until M30. This process is carried out for each building and is documented in this report separately for each building case. The descriptions of buildings, systems, and modifications are documented in a detailed manner to provide a rich documentation of the technology enablers produced by PRELUDE. This includes securing the extensive monitoring of both buildings and the connection of the monitoring infrastructure to the PRELUDE platform (FusiX middleware) together with the identification of available data points in the middleware. Moreover, the first analysis of the data (energy and IEQ) was carried out to better identify the potential of the implementation of technology . Finally, the outcome of bilateral discussions and planning for each demo building and the PRELUDE technologies is summarized. Each technology that was identified as a potential for implementation and / or identified as being of value to the buildings or valuable for the technology to be tested in the operational environment is described.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.006 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".