Working the Border:The Borderwork of Cross-border Commuters at the Danish-German border
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Habiter dans un pays et travailler dans un autre est une réalité quotidienne pour des milliers de personnes en Europe. Les contributions de cet ouvrage analysent ces flux de travailleurs frontaliers sous de nombreuses facettes, afin d’en déceler les similitudes et différences d’un espace à l’autre. Sont discutés plus particulièrement les réalités et défis socio-économiques, mais aussi socio-culturels, territoriaux et juridiques du travail frontalier dans les régions transfrontalières sélectionnées. Les nombreuses études mobilisées dans cet ouvrage éclairent des aspects méconnus du travail frontalier en Europe. L’objectif est d’encourager de nouveaux travaux sur ce sujet tout en favorisant le dialogue entre Science et Politique afin de développer des solutions transfrontalières pour une résilience territoriale dans un contexte de polycrise en Europe.Living in one country and working in another is a daily reality for thousands of people in Europe. The contributions in this book analyze the many facets of cross-border worker flows, identifying similarities and differences from one area to another. The socio-economic, socio-cultural, territorial and legal realities and challenges of cross-border work in selected cross-border regions are discussed in detail. The many findings in this book shed light on little-known aspects of cross-border work in Europe. The aim is to encourage new research on this topic, while promoting dialogue between science and policy in order to develop cross-border solutions for territorial resilience in the context of polycrisis in Europe.Digital version available on :Strada lex BelgiumStrada lex LuxemburgStrada lex EuropaYou have a subscription? Activate the digital version for free with the code in the book.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.023 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".