MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412232212

Local Behavior and Graphical Models for Stochastic Processes

2023· article· en· W4412232212 on OpenAlexaff
Jakob D. Thøstesen

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicSimulation Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGraphical modelComputer scienceStatistical physicsArtificial intelligencePhysics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Stochastic processes are used to model quantities that exhibit random fluctuations over time, such as stock prices, temperatures, wind speeds, etc. Lévy processes make up a popular class of models due to their theoretical properties and applications in e.g. finance and physics.<br/>From a theoretical point of view these processes evolve in continuous time but in practice only a finite number of observations are available. Understanding the implications of this discretization is essential and in many cases it requires knowledge of the local properties of the process. The first paper in this dissertation is concerned with a specific discretization scheme for positive self-similar Markov processes. To describe this we rely on knowledge about small-time fluctuations of Lévy processes. In another paper we examine the local properties of diffusions. At a fixed time point such a process behaves locally as a scaled Brownian motion and we prove a similar result for the small-time fluctuations at the supremum. The theory which describes a univariate Lévy process before and after its supremum is well-known and relies on the notion of a Lévy process conditioned to stay positive or negative. In a third paper we extend this to the multivariate setting, constructing the law of a Lévy process conditioned to stay in a half-space. This is related to splitting the process at its directional supremum and we further conjecture how it can be used to describe the local behavior of the process when it is farthest from the origin.<br/>One of the big challenges in modern statistics is dealing with high-dimensional data. Classical models are faced with an increased risk of overfitting, large computational cost and low interpretability. The concept of sparsity addresses these issues by taking advantage of lower-dimensional structures in the data. The use of graphical models is one way of promoting sparsity and has recently been introduced in multivariate extreme value theory. The final paper in this dissertation introduces graphical models in the context of Lévy processes. To do this we exploit a subtle connection to extremes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.953
Threshold uncertainty score0.145

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.204
GPT teacher head0.454
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSimulation Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207