MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412281450

Reactive transport and the genesis of kimberlites

2011· article· en· W4412281450 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Llewellyn Pilbeam, T. F. D. Nielsen, Tod Waight

Bibliographic record

VenueResearch at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicClay minerals and soil interactions
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsKimberliteGeochemistryGeologyEarth scienceMantle (geology)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

When studying the bulk rock analysis of kimberlites a <br/>significant correction for visible xenocrysts must be made <br/>[1,2]. Such studies concluded that olivine in kimberlite has a <br/>xenocrystic core and cognate margin. Previously, material <br/>entrained by the melt and dissolved during transport has only <br/>been qualitatively discussed [3]. We find bulk rock and <br/>electron microprobe data strongly support dissolution of <br/>orthopyroxene coupled with crystallization of cognate olivine <br/>rims in the Majuagaa kimberlite sensu stricto dyke. This <br/>reaction was suggested by the topography of phase diagrams <br/>for systems containing Enstatite, Forsterite and CO2. The <br/>‘parental’ melt for Majuagaa kimberlite was magnesiocarbonatite <br/>which entrained 50wt% harzburgite, consistent with <br/>melting experiments. The melt processed ~20wt% SiO2 but at <br/>any given time had no more than ~5wt% SiO2. We explain <br/>geochemical variations across the southern West Greenland <br/>kimberlites sensu lato using similar processes. We may also <br/>account for the intercraton variety in kimberlite composition <br/>and mineralogy. <br/>Mg# and Ni composition was obtained for transects across <br/>olivine grains. Pure Rayleigh fractionation did not explain the <br/>shape of the nickel transects. Diffusion between <br/>homogeneous olivine grains and melt was also eliminated. <br/>The data was replicated using a combination of growth and <br/>minor later diffusion. Growth was modeled using AFC <br/>equations [4]. Later diffusive equilibration between core and <br/>margin was minor. Since kimberlite transport time was short <br/>magmatic temperatures of ~900oC were supported. <br/>! <br/>[1] Nielsen &amp; Sand (2008), Canadian Mineralogist 46, 1043- <br/>1061 [2] Ardnt, Guitreau, Boullier, Le Roex, Tommasi, <br/>Cordier &amp; Sobolev (2010), Journal of Petrology 51, 573-602 <br/>[3] Mitchell (2008), Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal <br/>Research 174, 1-8 [4] De Paulo (1981), Earth and Planetary <br/>Science Letters 53, 189-202

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.240
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.2450.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.064
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueResearch at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen)Same topicClay minerals and soil interactionsFrench-language works237,207