MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412298665

Cognitive Behavior Treatment for Child and Adolescent Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (OCD): One Year Treatment Responder Outcomes from the Nordic Long-term OCD Treatment Study (NordLOTS)

2017· article· en· W4412298665 on OpenAlexaff
Davíð R.M.A. Højgaard, Katja Anna Hybel, Tord Ivarsson, Gudmundur Skarphéðinsson, Judith Becker Nissen, Bernhard Weidle, Karin Melin, Nor Christian Torp, Robert Valderhaug, Kitty Dahl, Erik Lykke Mortensen, Scott N. Compton, Sanne Jensen, Fabian Lenhard, Per Hove Thomsen

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicObsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
Canadian institutionsChild, Adolescent and Family Mental Health
Fundersnot available
KeywordsObsessive compulsiveExposure and response preventionPsychologyCognitionTerm (time)Clinical psychologyPsychotherapistPsychiatry
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Obsessive-compulsive Disorder (OCD) affects between 0.25% and 4% of children and adolescents.<br/>Around 40% of youth with OCD continue to meet criteria for OCD well into adulthood. Cognitive behavioral<br/>therapy (CBT) is the recommended first line treatment for pediatric OCD. Consistent with the available followup<br/>research on pediatric OCD, we expected treatment effects, for initial treatment responders, to last<br/>throughout the first year following acute treatment. Methods: This prospective follow-up study was a part of<br/>the Nordic Long-term OCD Treatment Study (NordLOTS) in which 177 responders to 14 weeks of manualized<br/>CBT in an open trial program were assessed six and twelve months after treatment termination. Treatment<br/>response was defined as a Children’s Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale (CY-BOCS) total score &lt; 16, and<br/>remission was defined as a CY-BOCS total score ≤10. Results: At one-year follow-up 155 (87.6%) of the original<br/>sample were available for assessment and 142 (91.6%) were still rated as responders. Of these 121 (78.1%)<br/>were in remission. Mixed effects analysis revealed that patients continued to show symptom reduction over<br/>the one year follow-up period (F[2, 313.15] = 11.230, p &lt; 0.001). Twenty-eight patients relapsed (CY-BOCS ≥16)<br/>during the one-year follow-up where of 11 returned to responder status by the 12-month assessment point.<br/>Conclusion: Results of this follow-up study suggest that manualized CBT applied in community settings has<br/>durable effects for initial responders to treatment, and that patients continue to improve during the first year<br/>following acute treatment. Clinical trials registration information: Nordic Long-term Obsessive-Compulsive<br/>Disorder (OCD) Treatment Study; www.controlled-trials.com; ISRCTN66385119.<br/>Long-Term Effectiveness of Cognitive Behavioral Treatment (CBT) and Sertraline

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.084
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.053
GPT teacher head0.365
Teacher spread0.313 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicObsessive-Compulsive Spectrum DisordersFrench-language works237,207