Visualization and Analysis of Employee Performance Data Using a Power BI-based Business Intelligence Dashboard
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In the current digital and competitive era, the utilization of Business Intelligence (BI) technology has become crucial in supporting data-driven decision-making. This research aims to develop and analyze a Power BI-based Business Intelligence dashboard focused on visualizing employee performance. This study was conducted by collecting performance data from the Human Resource Information System (HRIS), which was then processed and visualized in the form of key metrics such as attendance rates, individual target achievements, productivity per division, and periodic performance evaluations. Power BI was chosen for its ability to integrate various data sources and present interactive visualizations that are easy for management to understand. The methodology used involves the ETL (Extract, Transform, Load) process, data model design, and the development of visual reports that support descriptive and comparative analysis. The results of this study indicate that the use of BI dashboards significantly helps the company in monitoring employee performance in real-time, identifying trends in productivity decline, and designing data-driven improvement strategies. In addition, this dashboard also serves as an effective communication tool between management and the HR division. Thus, the use of Power BI as a tool for visualization and performance analysis adds significant value to the strategic and data-driven management of human resources
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.007 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it