MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412361594 · doi:10.1029/2025sw004435

Ionospheric Scintillation and Geomagnetic Disturbance Caused by Space Hurricanes

2025· article· en· W4412361594 on OpenAlex
Sheng Lu, Zan‐Yang Xing, Qinghe Zhang, Yongliang Zhang, Huigen Yang, Kjellmar Oksavik, L. R. Lyons, K. Shiokawa, Yong Wang, Yu‐Zhang Ma, Xiangyu Wang, Tong Xu, Shuji Sun, Duan Zhang

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueSpace Weather · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicIonosphere and magnetosphere dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Key Research and Development Program of ChinaJapan Society for the Promotion of ScienceNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanadian Space AgencyNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaNatural Science Foundation of Shandong ProvinceNew Brunswick Innovation FoundationChinese Academy of SciencesNational Science Foundation
KeywordsEarth's magnetic fieldScintillationInterplanetary scintillationIonosphereDisturbance (geology)Space weatherGeomagnetic stormMeteorologyEnvironmental scienceAtmospheric sciencesSpace (punctuation)GeologyGeophysicsPhysicsComputer scienceNuclear physicsMagnetic fieldSolar windCoronal mass ejectionOpticsGeomorphology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract A space hurricane is a large‐scale, cyclone‐shaped aurora characterized by a rotating magnetic structure and shears in plasma convection, driven by high‐latitude magnetic reconnection. It typically forms near the magnetic poles in summertime, providing an efficient energy transport channel from the solar wind to the Earth's magnetosphere under northward interplanetary magnetic field conditions. Here, we present a detailed case study of a typical space hurricane that occurred on 20 August 2014 and its impact on the polar ionosphere in the Northern Hemisphere. Multi‐instrument observations from the Eureka GNSS receiver, SWARM and Defense Meteorological Satellite Program (DMSP) satellites indicate that GPS signals experienced enhanced phase scintillation near a space hurricane, coinciding with regions of large plasma density gradients and flow shears. Based on these in situ measurements, we estimated growth timescales of ∼94 s for gradient‐drift instability and ∼352 s for KHI, supporting the plausibility of both instabilities. These plasma instabilities likely generated small‐scale irregularities responsible for the observed scintillation effects on satellite signals. Geomagnetic data from the Greenland ground stations revealed intense local geomagnetic disturbances, likely associated with enhanced Hall currents driven by the upward field‐aligned currents linked to the space hurricane. In situ plasma observations from the DMSP and SWARM satellites revealed pronounced electron density enhancements and steep gradients on the morning side of the space hurricane, likely driven by ionospheric convection and soft particle precipitation. This study provides the first comprehensive insight into the space weather effects of space hurricanes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.632
Threshold uncertainty score0.905

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.002
GPT teacher head0.201
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it