MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4412363722 · doi:10.3168/jds.2025-26595

Effect of dietary palmitic acid supplementation and milking frequency: 1. Milk production and composition in early-lactation dairy cows

2025· article· en· W4412363722 on OpenAlexafffund
R. Lessard, François Huot, P.Y. Chouinard, R. Gervais

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Dairy Science · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicRuminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
Canadian institutionsUniversité de SherbrookeUniversité Laval
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaFonds de recherche du Québec – Nature et technologiesMinistère de l'Agriculture, des Pêcheries et de l'AlimentationUniversité Laval
KeywordsLactoseLactationMilkingPalmitic acidLatin squareFood scienceDry matterAnimal scienceComposition (language)Conjugated linoleic acidFatty acidChemistryBiologyBiochemistryRumenLinoleic acidPregnancy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dietary palmitic acid (PA) supplementation can be used to increase milk fat yield by dairy cows. Additionally, increasing milking frequency (MF) promotes milk production. Both practices are of interest to enhance milk performance, but their effects on milk properties are a concern from a milk processing perspective. Moreover, little is known regarding the possible interaction between those 2 practices on milk performance. This study aimed to evaluate whether milk responses of early-lactation dairy cows could benefit from the combined effects of PA supplementation and increased MF. Additionally, we determined the effects of the 2 practices on milk free fatty acids (FFA) content, milk protein fractions such as CN and whey proteins, and plasmin activity in milk. Eight early-lactation multiparous Holstein cows were randomly allocated to treatment sequences in a replicated 4 × 4 Latin square design with a 2 × 2 factorial arrangement of treatments. Levels of treatments were dietary PA (0% or 2% on a DM basis) and 2 or 3 milkings per day at equal intervals of time. Periods lasted 21 d with 16 d for treatment adaptation before data and sample collection. Except for lactose concentration, no significant interaction between MF and PA supplementation was observed. Dry matter intake was not affected by treatment. Increased MF and PA supplementation both increased milk, fat, and protein yields, as well as milk efficiency. Palmitic acid supplementation increased the yield of 16 C fatty acids (FA) in milk at the expense of shorter de novo FA. Calculated desaturase indexes increased with PA, indicating an increased Δ 9 -desaturase activity or expression. In contrast, most desaturase indexes decreased with MF. Dry matter and NDF digestibilities were similar between treatments. However, PA decreased total and 16 C FA digestibilities. Transfer of 16 C FA into milk was increased with PA supplementation. Neither MF nor PA had an effect on FFA concentration in fresh milk. Milk concentrations of total N, true protein, CN, or whey proteins were similar between treatments. However, even if milk CP yield was increased by both PA and thrice-daily milking, CN yield was not affected by PA and only tended to be increased by thrice-daily milking. The effects of PA supplementation and MF on milk performance were additive. Under the conditions of this trial, increased MF and PA supplementation did not impair milk composition parameters of importance for milk processing.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Dairy Science→Same topicRuminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology→French-language works237,207→