MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412364538 · doi:10.1186/s12904-025-01840-0

Factors that support home deaths for patients receiving at-home palliative and end-of-life care: a sequential mixed-methods explanatory study

2025· article· en· W4412364538 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Kelley Kilpatrick, Émilie Allard, Mira Jabbour, Éric Tchouaket Nguemeleu

Bibliographic record

VenueBMC Palliative Care · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPalliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec en OutaouaisUniversité de MontréalCentre Intégré Universitaire de Santé et de Services Sociaux du Centre-Sud-de-l'Île-de-MontréalHôpital Maisonneuve-RosemontMcGill University Health Centre
FundersMcGill University
KeywordsPalliative careEnd-of-life careMedicinePain medicineExplanatory modelGerontologyNursingFamily medicinePsychiatryAnesthesiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Significant knowledge gaps persist in understanding how to support patients receiving palliative and end-of-life care (PEoLC) who wish to die at home. This study aimed to identify factors associated with remaining at home and home death for patients receiving PEoLC. METHODS: A sequential mixed-methods explanatory study (QUANT + QUAL) was conducted. Administrative data from a not-for-profit at-home palliative care organization in Québec Canada from 2015 to 2024 (n = 5931) and 73 semi-structured interviews with patients receiving PEoLC, caregivers, service providers and decision-makers were collected. Logistic and Cox regression models were completed for the quantitative data analysis. Content analysis was used for the qualitative data analysis. Data integration occurred following the quantitative analyses. RESULTS: The mean age of patients requiring PEoLC was 77.97 (SD: 13.70) years. The sample included 50.3% men and 49.7% women. One quarter (25.8%) of patients receiving PEoLC lived alone. Most patients (93.5%) had cancer. Home death occurred in almost 30% of cases. Over 95% of deaths occurred within 365 days following admission to the at-home palliative care organization. Access to respite care (adjusted odds ratio: 2.699, p < 0.001), female sex, living alone, having been hospitalized, receiving psychological care, and volunteer and transportation support were associated with remaining at home and home deaths for patients receiving PEoLC. The interviews highlighted the importance of respecting the patients' wishes related to end of life and home death. All participants described several challenges to access timely and reliable services following the pandemic. Timely access to home care, nursing and hygiene and a palliative care approach facilitated remaining at home and home death for patients receiving PEoLC. CONCLUSIONS: Respite care more than doubles the odds of remaining at home and home death. Timely access to services that include home care, nursing care and hygiene and a palliative care approach is essential to support patients receiving PEoLC who wish to die at home. Stabilizing staffing of home care teams, standardizing PEoLC services offered across community health centers in the province, and optimal use of nurse practitioners would improve services offered to patients receiving PEoLC and their caregivers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.084
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.149
GPT teacher head0.445
Teacher spread0.296 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2025
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBMC Palliative CareSame topicPalliative Care and End-of-Life IssuesFrench-language works237,207