MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412367173 · doi:10.1109/tbc.2025.3583989

Novel Distributed Multimedia Recommendation Systems Using Personalized Information

2025· article· en· W4412367173 on OpenAlexaff
Shih Yu Chang, Hsiao‐Chun Wu, Kun Yan, Scott C.-H. Huang, Yiyan Wu

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Broadcasting · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicRecommender Systems and Techniques
Canadian institutionsWestern University
FundersNational Science and Technology CouncilNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaNational Science Foundation
KeywordsComputer scienceMultimediaRecommender systemWorld Wide Web

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we propose a novel distributed multimedia recommendation system (DMRS) to address personalized preference by use of the matrix-sketching approach for dimensionality reduction and local information updates. Conventional recommendation systems can hardly address scalability, privacy, and robustness, all of which are very important in practice. To combat the aforementioned challenges, we propose to incorporate local information updates based on local private information at the client side to protect privacy by restricting users’ data from the server and utilize the matrix-sketching scheme to further reduce the dimensionality of the global user-item interaction data so that the personalized (distributed) recommendations can be made by users’ devices in local. To evaluate the system performance, we define a new robustness measure, namely ϵ-robustness, which quantifies the performance consistency of the recommendation system and involves both sketching errors and local rating updates. Furthermore, we introduce a novel randomized matrix-factorization algorithm to achieve the desired robustness while still maintaining the interaction-data fidelity in terms of normalized root-mean-square error (NRMSE). Our experimental results on both simulated and real-world data demonstrate the effectiveness of our proposed novel DMRS in attaining a good balance between the interaction-data fidelity and the system robustness subject to the privacy protection.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.942
Threshold uncertainty score0.730

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.283
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on BroadcastingSame topicRecommender Systems and TechniquesFrench-language works237,207