Brincidofovir in the Era of Mpox
Bibliographic record
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Mpox (formerly monkeypox), a systemic infection caused by the mpox virus (MPXV), has become a global problem of increasing concern. There are currently no antiviral treatments that have been shown to be safe and effective for the treatment of mpox. AREAS COVERED: Brincidofovir is a lipid-modified acyclic nucleotide with in vitro and in vivo activity against multiple DNA viruses, including MPXV. It is licensed in the US and Canada for the treatment of human smallpox disease in adults and children, including neonates. It has been used under FDA-authorized emergency use for patients in the US with severe mpox. The authors review the antiviral activity, clinical development, pharmacokinetics, safety and efficacy of brincidofovir and its potential as an mpox treatment. A comprehensive review was conducted in PubMed, Science Direct, Embase and Google Scholar. EXPERT OPINION: Research is needed to better understand mpox epidemiology, natural history, antiviral therapy and vaccines. Brincidofovir is being evaluated in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial under the Mpox Study in Africa (MOSA) protocol. Additional studies will assist in clarification of single vs. combination therapy, safety and populations most likely to benefit, as well as the management of treatment complications such as immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome (IRIS).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".