MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412387662 · doi:10.1080/13696998.2025.2530862

Cost-effectiveness analysis of pembrolizumab as an adjuvant treatment of early-stage non-small cell lung cancer following complete resection and platinum-based chemotherapy in Canada

2025· article· en· W4412387662 on OpenAlexaffabout
Sylvi Nguyen, Elizabeth Wehler, Arielle G. Bensimon, Natasha B. Leighl, Sreetama Sarkar, Xiaohan Hu, Ruifeng Xu, Brian M. Lang, Ashwini Arunachalam, Ralph P. Insinga

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Medical Economics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
Canadian institutionsPrincess Margaret Cancer CentreMerck Canada Inc. (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePembrolizumabStage (stratigraphy)ChemotherapyOncologyLung cancerAdjuvant chemotherapyAdjuvantCancerInternal medicineResectionSurgeryImmunotherapy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

AIM: To assess the cost-effectiveness of adjuvant pembrolizumab (Keytruda) versus routine observation of adult patients with stage IB (T2a ≥ 4 cm) -IIIA with programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) tumor proportion score (TPS) <50% who have undergone complete resection and platinum-based chemotherapy from the Canadian public healthcare payer perspective. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A Markov model was constructed to capture clinical and economic outcomes across four health states: disease-free (DF), local-regional recurrence (LR), distant metastases (DM), and death. Transition probabilities (TPs) from the DF state were populated using clinical trial data from KEYNOTE-091. TPs from the LR state were from real-world evidence (RWE). Clinical trial and network meta-analysis output populated transitions from DM. TPs from LR and DM were calibrated to fit the KEYNOTE-091 survival data. Costs were reported in 2023 Canadian dollars and utilities were based on data from KEYNOTE-091 and metastatic NSCLC clinical trials. RESULTS: Pembrolizumab extended life years (LYs) (1.55) and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) (1.19). Costs increased by $84,050, resulting in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) per additional LY of $54,219 and per additional QALY of $70,725, below the willingness-to-pay threshold of $100,000. Survival gains associated with pembrolizumab were attributed to more time spent in the DF health state. Higher costs for pembrolizumab were due to adjuvant treatment costs but were partially offset by lower subsequent treatment costs in downstream health states, reflecting a lower risk of recurrence associated with pembrolizumab. The model results remained robust across scenario and sensitivity analyses. LIMITATIONS: Due to lack of transition probabilities starting from the LR and DM states from the KEYNOTE-091 trial, TPs from the LR and DM states were estimated using non-trial sources. CONCLUSIONS: Adjuvant pembrolizumab was found to be cost-effective compared to routine observation from the public healthcare payer perspective in Canada.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.080
Threshold uncertainty score0.693

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.321
Teacher spread0.297 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Medical EconomicsSame topicCancer Immunotherapy and BiomarkersFrench-language works237,207