Prefrontal and ventral striatal dendritic morphology: Effects of life-long complex housing and amphetamine administration
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Complex housing is one of the most effective experiences in producing plastic changes in the brain. For example, animals living in complex environments show widespread synaptic changes both in cerebral cortex and the striatum. Similarly, repeatedly treating animals with drugs such as amphetamine also induces changes in prefrontal cortex and the striatum. The purpose of the current study was to determine the effects of life-long housing in a complex environment versus standard laboratory caging and the later effects of amphetamine. Both male and female Long-Evans rats were placed in complex environments for about 110 days, beginning at conception, until adulthood at which time they were administered saline or amphetamine daily (1 mg/kg, IP) for 14 days. A week later the brains were harvested and processed for Golgi-Cox staining to analyze dendritic length, branching, and spine density in prefrontal cortex (areas Cg3 and AID) and Nucleus Accumbens (NAcc). Prolonged enriched housing produced significant synaptic changes in all three measures in all three areas measured, but the effects differed in the two sexes. Amphetamine produced large synaptic changes in Cg3 and NAcc in males but only spine changes in those regions in females. Complex housing did not interact with the later effects of amphetamine administration. Thus, both complex housing and amphetamine can produce a range of synaptic changes depending upon sex and area examined. Furthermore, the effect of complex housing varies depending on the details of when complex housing is begun and how long it lasts.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".