MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412393107 · doi:10.1016/j.jogc.2025.103037

The Role of Simulation in Knowledge Dissemination and Improving Clinical Outcomes for the Management of Impacted Fetal Head at Cesarean Delivery

2025· article· en· W4412393107 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Chris Nash, Elizabeth Randle, Allyson Cruickshank, Jocelyn Stairs

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSimulation-Based Education in Healthcare
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineGuidelineSession (web analytics)Poisson regressionFetal headPsychological interventionMaternal morbidityConfidence intervalObstetricsEmergency medicinePregnancyNursingFetusPopulation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVES: Impacted fetal head (IFH) is an obstetrical emergency associated with maternal and fetal morbidity. The aim of this study was to assess the role of a simulation session on the management of IFH at cesarean delivery as a method of disseminating guideline recommendations to obstetricians. The secondary aim was to assess the clinical impact of this initiative. METHODS: An IFH simulation session based on recent guidelines was developed using the PROMPT FLEX enhanced cesarean delivery model to review pull, push, and Patwardhan techniques. All faculty and obstetrical trainees were invited to participate. Participants completed baseline and post-session surveys. Survey scores were compared using a paired t-test and analysis of variance. To assess clinical impact, a 6-month pre/post cohort of all patients who underwent second-stage cesarean delivery was assembled. Multivariable robust Poisson regression models were used to estimate the relative risk of a composite maternal/neonatal morbidity outcome pre-and post-implementation. RESULTS: Thirty-four clinicians participated (21 trainees, 13 faculty). Trainees demonstrated significant, sustained improvement in knowledge following participation (P < 0.001). Trainees reported sustained comfort with push and pull techniques, but comfort with Patwardhan waned (P = 0.03). Faculty comfort was unchanged for push and pull techniques but significantly improved for Patwardhan (P = 0.01). The adjusted relative risk of composite maternal/neonatal morbidity following implementation was unchanged (relative risk 1.03; 95% CI 0.75-1.42). However, neonatal intensive care unit admissions were reduced (P = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: An IFH simulation session was associated with improvement in trainee knowledge and faculty and trainee comfort with the Patwardhan technique. Simulation may be an effective tool to improve obstetrician comfort with novel recommendations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.015
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.056
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.081

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0150.056
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.370
Teacher spread0.348 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology CanadaSame topicSimulation-Based Education in HealthcareFrench-language works237,207