MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412393962 · doi:10.4081/ecj.2025.13766

Shiitake mushroom bezoar: a rare cause of small bowel obstruction in Vietnam and lessons in diagnosis and management

2025· article· en· W4412393962 on OpenAlexaff
Minh‐Quang Tran, Phu-Cuong Pham, My-Tran Trinh, Quang-Duy Ngo, Kim-Long Le

Bibliographic record

VenueEmergency Care Journal · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicIntestinal and Peritoneal Adhesions
Canadian institutionsPancreas Centre (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBezoarMedicineMushroomGeneral surgeryInternal medicineFood science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Small Bowel Obstruction (SBO) caused by shiitake mushroom bezoars is a rare clinical entity, with no prior cases documented in Vietnam despite the frequent consumption of these mushrooms in traditional dishes. We report the case of a 69-year-old male who presented with SBO symptoms after ingesting a whole shiitake mushroom without chewing due to significant molar tooth loss. Computed Tomography (CT) imaging revealed characteristic features of a bezoar, and exploratory laparoscopy confirmed an obstructing shiitake mushroom bezoar, which was removed via enterotomy. This case highlights the diagnostic challenges of radiolucent bezoars and the critical importance of dietary history and characteristic CT findings. Preoperative assessments could facilitate less invasive surgical strategies, reducing the risks associated with enterotomy, such as anastomotic leakage. Clinicians should remain aware of regional dietary practices to enhance diagnostic precision and optimize management strategies, especially in highrisk populations with compromised mastication.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.311
Teacher spread0.283 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEmergency Care JournalSame topicIntestinal and Peritoneal AdhesionsFrench-language works237,207